Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238417›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2019

Longevity, effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life of low-concentration hydrogen peroxides in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial.

Nayara Kelly Lyrio Ferraz, Lilian Capanema Nogueira, Isabela Moreira Neiva, Raquel Conceição Ferreira, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Claudia Silami Magalhães

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nayara Kelly Lyrio FerrazDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lilian Capanema NogueiraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isabela Moreira NeivaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raquel Conceição FerreiraDepartment of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Allyson Nogueira MoreiraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Claudia Silami MagalhãesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. silamics@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-8089
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study evaluated the longevity, effectiveness, safety, and impact on the oral health-related quality of life of in-office dental bleaching using low-concentration hydrogen peroxides. MATERIALS AND

methodsRandomized, parallel, and double-blinded clinical trial was performed with 54 participants using 6% or 15% hydrogen peroxide (HP) in-office bleaching activated via hybrid LED/laser light. Tooth color was evaluated at baseline (T1), 1 week of bleaching (T2), 2 weeks of bleaching (T3) and 1 week (T4) and 6 months (T5) after finishing the bleaching using the Classical Vita™ scale and spectrophotometer. Tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation were measured with Visual Numeric Scale and Modified Gingival Index. The impact on quality of life was evaluated using the Oral Impact on Daily Performance. The data were analyzed using the Friedman, Mann-Whitney, and McNemar tests (p < 0.05).

resultsThe group HP15% presented significant color change (ΔE) from T1 to T4 (p = 0.002) and T1 to T5 (p < 0.001). Parameters L, a*, and b* differed significantly at T3, T4, and T5 compared T1 for both groups. At 6-month follow-up, 57.1% of HP6 and 43.7% of HP15% participants migrated from B1 to a darker color. No significant differences were observed between the groups in tooth sensitivity, gingival irritation, or impact on quality of life.

conclusionsBoth agents showed bleaching effectiveness, but HP15% presented greater color stability than HP6%, at 6-month follow-up. The agents showed low levels of tooth sensitivity, gingival irritation, and did not affect the oral health-related quality of life of the participants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite the greater presence of sensitivity during treatment compared with 6% hydrogen peroxide, 15% hydrogen peroxide demonstrated better bleaching effectiveness, and greater color stability at the end of bleaching and at 6-month follow-up. The use of 15% hydrogen peroxide presents more suitable results.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTooth BleachingAdolescentAdultDentin SensitivityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydrogen PeroxideMaleTooth Bleaching AgentsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHydrogen PeroxideTooth Bleaching AgentsDental bleachingHydrogen peroxideLongevityQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30238417
OpenAlexW2891496710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.