Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238326›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2018

Cabergoline for the treatment of bromocriptine-resistant invasive giant prolactinomas.

Hai Yan Huang, Weiwei Zhai, Hao Tang, Guo Zhen Hui, Zhe Bao Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. DRD2 expression based onEndocrine · 2023
    Article
  7. Recent Advances in Treatment of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion.Obstetrical & gynecological survey · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Aggressive pituitary tumors in the young and elderly.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hai Yan HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center of Pituitary Tumor, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197# Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei ZhaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hao TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center of Pituitary Tumor, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197# Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, China.
Guo Zhen HuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. guozhen-hui@163.com.
Zhe Bao WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center of Pituitary Tumor, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197# Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, China. zhebaowu@aliyun.com.
Ruijin Hospital · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFew studies have specifically focused on the effect of cabergoline on invasive giant prolactinomas (IGPs) resistant to bromocriptine. This study aims to evaluate whether cabergoline could be used as an effective therapy for patients with bromocriptine-resistant IGPs.

methodsThis retrospective study included 15 patients with bromocriptine-resistant IGPs who received treatment at our department during 2007-2015. Cabergoline was administered in all 15 patients, with the dose adjusted depending on the prolactin response of each patient. Parameters for outcome assessment included prolactin level, pituitary function, tumor size, improvement of the clinical symptoms, visual field defects, drug tolerance, and disease recurrence.

resultsCabergoline was effective for the treatment of the patients with bromocriptine -resistant IGPs as represented by normalization of the prolactin level in 12/15 patients; improvement or normalization of the pituitary function in 4/5 patients with hypopituitarism; significant reduction in tumor size in 14/15 patients; and relief of the clinical symptoms in 11/15 patients. All 15 patients showed good tolerance to cabergoline. In addition, no recurrence was observed during the mean follow-up period of 63.47 (range 30-145) months.

conclusionsData of this retrospective study demonstrate that cabergoline is an excellent option for the treatment of patients with bromocriptine-resistant IGPs.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdolescentAdultBromocriptineCabergolineFemaleHumansHyperprolactinemiaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPituitary NeoplasmsProlactinProlactinomaRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureBromocriptineCabergolineProlactinBromocriptineCabergolineDrug resistanceInvasive giant prolactinomas

Identifiers

PMID30238326
OpenAlexW2891446783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.