ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019
Substitution of poultry and red meat with fish and the risk of peripheral arterial disease: a Danish cohort study.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Substitution of animal-based with plant-based foods on cardiometabolic health and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The (ab)use of food frequency questionnaire data in substitution modelling in nutritional epidemiology: a critique.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Review
- "Shaking the ladder" reveals how analytic choices can influence associations in nutrition epidemiology: beef intake and coronary heart disease as a case study.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2026Review
- Consumption of different types of meat and the risk of chronic limb-threatening ischemia: the Singapore Chinese Health Study.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were to examine associations between substitutions of poultry and red meat intake with fish (total, lean or fatty) and the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We hypothesised that a higher intake of fish and a concomitant lower intake of poultry or red meat were associated with a lower risk of incident PAD.
methodsWe used data from a Danish cohort where middle-aged participants filled in food frequency and lifestyle questionnaires at baseline. During follow-up, we identified participants with valid diagnoses of PAD and analysed data by multivariable Cox regression analyses. Substitutions of 150 g/week of either poultry, red meat (processed or unprocessed) with 150 g/week of fish (total, lean or fatty) were explored.
resultsWe followed the cohort (n = 54,597) for a median of 13.6 years and identified 897 cases with PAD. We found modest lower rates of PAD when intake of fish replaced a concomitant lower intake of unprocessed (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.01) and processed red meat (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.02). Replacing unprocessed (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-1.00) or processed red meat (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.01) with fatty fish was associated with lower rates of PAD. No associations were observed when fish intake replaced poultry or when lean fish replaced red meat.
conclusionsThis study suggests that substituting red meat with fish and especially fatty fish may be associated with a lower risk of PAD, although not statistically significant. Replacing poultry with fish was not associated with the risk of PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30238314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.