Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238310›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Preoperative diagnostic of parotid gland neoplasms: fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy?

Peter Zbären, Asterios Triantafyllou, Kenneth O Devaney, Vincent Vander Poorten, Henrik Hellquist, Alessandra Rinaldo, Alfio Ferlito

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preoperatively Diagnosed Versus Undiagnosed Major Salivary Gland Cancer: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Oncological Outcomes.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative Outcomes of Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy for Parotid Masses.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Core Needle Biopsy May Predict Prognosis Preoperatively in Parotid Cancer.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Applying deep learning-based ensemble model to [Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter ZbärenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. peter.zbaeren@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-6934
Asterios TriantafyllouCellular Pathology, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Kenneth O DevaneyDepartment of Pathology, Allegiance Health, Jackson, MI, USA.
Vincent Vander PoortenSection Head and Neck Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Henrik HellquistCentre of Biomedical Research (CBMR), Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Alessandra RinaldoUniversity of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.
Alfio FerlitoInternational Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A preoperative cytologic or histologic diagnosis of parotid gland neoplasms is mandatory to decide which surgical procedure would be appropriate. Open biopsies are contraindicated because of the risk of recurrence secondary to tumour cell seeding; furthermore a subsequent curative parotid surgery can be complicated by a previous open biopsy. While fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was the only preoperative diagnostic procedure to distinguish benign versus malignant neoplasms over the past decades, core needle biopsy (CNB) has been increasingly used over the last few years. This created a debate as to whether FNAC or CNB should be the preoperative procedure of choice. The focus of this editorial is to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of FNAC and CNB, and to discuss which procedure is more appropriate in the preoperative work-up of parotid neoplasms.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansParotid GlandParotid NeoplasmsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.