ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018
Reply to Garcia-Tabar et al.: Quality control of open-circuit respirometry: real-time, laboratory-based systems. Let us spread "good practice".
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A new objective method for determining exercise gas exchange thresholds by respiratory frequency in middle-aged men.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis article is in response to the Letter of Garcia-Tabar et al. [Eur J Appl Physiol (in press), 2018] relating to the issue of post-test sensor calibration 'verification'. This issue is poorly addressed in contemporary patient-related position statements on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).
methodsPost-test sensor calibration verification approaches were compared.
resultThe potential impact on data quality of changing sensor calibration during the course of an exercise test was described.
conclusionIt is recommended that post-test sensor calibration verification be incorporated into existing CPET 'best practice'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30238249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.