Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238239›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Early stage periarticular injection during total knee arthroplasty may provide a better postoperative pain relief than late-stage periarticular injection: a randomized-controlled trial.

Sachiyuki Tsukada, Kenji Kurosaka, Tetsuyuki Maeda, Akihiro Iida, Masahiro Nishino, Naoyuki Hirasawa

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sachiyuki TsukadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, 3-2-1 Higashihara, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-0035, Japan. s8058@nms.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-5232
Kenji KurosakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, 3-2-1 Higashihara, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-0035, Japan.
Tetsuyuki MaedaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, Mito, Japan.
Akihiro IidaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, Mito, Japan.
Masahiro NishinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, 3-2-1 Higashihara, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-0035, Japan.
Naoyuki HirasawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, 3-2-1 Higashihara, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-0035, Japan.
Kinan Hospital · JPMito Saiseikai General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to determine whether periarticular injection performed in the early stage of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could provide a better postoperative pain relief than periarticular injection performed in the late stage of TKA. The hypothesis was based on the concept that analgesic intervention before the onset of noxious stimuli would be associated with less postoperative pain.

methodsA total of 105 participants were randomly assigned to receive superficial injection just prior to arthrotomy (early stage periarticular injection group) or superficial injection after implanting the prosthesis (late-stage periarticular injection group) in patients undergoing unilateral TKA with 1:1 treatment allocation. In both groups, deep injection was performed according to the same schedule (just prior to implanting prosthesis). The solution consisted of 300 mg of ropivacaine, 8 mg of morphine, 40 mg of methylprednisolone, 50 mg of ketoprofen, and 0.3 mg of epinephrine mixed with normal saline to a final volume of 60 mL. All surgeries were managed under general anesthesia without any regional blocks. Registry-specified primary outcome was postoperative pain score at rest measured at the recovery room using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS score was compared between two groups and assessed to reach the reported threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 mm for the postoperative VAS score.

resultsThe VAS score at the recovery room was significantly lower in the early stage periarticular injection group than the late-stage periarticular injection group (23 ± 25 mm versus 39 ± 34 mm, respectively; 95% confidence interval 4-28 mm; p = 0.0078). The mean difference in the primary outcome fulfilled the MCID value.

conclusionsBringing forward the timing of periarticular injection may provide significant and clinically meaningful improvement in pain following TKA under general anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeInjections, Intra-ArticularAgedAnalgesicsAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, LocalDrug Administration ScheduleEpinephrineFemaleHumansKetoprofenMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalEpinephrineKetoprofenMorphineRopivacaineInjection techniquePainPeriarticular injectionPre-emptive analgesiaPrimary knee arthroplastyRandomized-controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30238239
PMCPMC6435609
OpenAlexW2891515113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.