Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238224›Full record

ArticleGenes & genomics2019

Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes and their response to abiotic stresses in tea plant (Camellia sinensis).

Pengjie Wang, Chuan Yue, Di Chen, Yucheng Zheng, Qian Zhang, Jiangfan Yang, Naixing Ye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genome-Wide Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family inFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chromosome-scale genome assembly ofHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  12. Molecular regulation of immunity in tea plants.Molecular biology reports · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification ofPeerJ · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cells · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pengjie WangCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China.
Chuan YueCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China.
Di ChenCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China.
Yucheng ZhengCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China.
Qian ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China.
Jiangfan YangCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China. yjf3001@163.com.
Naixing YeCollege of Horticulture, Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China. ynxtea@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-2813
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WRKY transcription factors (TFs) family is one of the largest TF families in plants and plays a central role in diverse regulation and multiple stress responses. However, the systematical analysis of the WRKY gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) based on genomic data has been lacking. The primary objective of this study was to set a systematic analysis of the WRKY gene family based on genomic data in tea plant and analyze their expression profiles under various abiotic stresses. We searched the tea plant genome using the consensus model of the WRKY domain (PF03106) and then used these search results to identify all the WRKY family members by SMART and the CDD program. Analyze their phylogeny, classification, structure, conserved motifs, Cis-elements, interactors and expression profiles. 56 putative WRKY genes were identified from the tea plant genome and divided into three main groups (I-III) and five subgroups (IIa-IIe) according to the WRKY domains and the zinc-finger structure. The gene structure and conserved motifs of the CsWRKY genes were also characterized and were consistent with the classification results. Annotation analysis showed that 34 CsWRKY genes may be involved in stress responses. Promoter analysis implied that CsWRKY genes, except for CsWRKY55, possessed at least one abiotic stress response cis-element. Expression profiles of CsWRKY genes in different tissues were analyzed with RNA-seq data. The results showed that 56 CsWRKY genes had differential expression in their transcript abundance. The expression profiles also showed that many identified CsWRKY genes were possibly involved in the response to cold, drought, salt, or ABA treatment. Tea plant genome contains at least 56 WRKY genes. These results provide useful information for further exploring the function and regulatory mechanism of CsWRKY genes in the growth, development, and adaption to abiotic stresses in tea plant.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalCamellia sinensisGenome, PlantMultigene FamilyPlant ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein DomainsTranscription FactorsPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAbiotic stressesCamellia sinensisExpression profilesWRKY

Identifiers

PMID30238224
OpenAlexW2891135587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.