ArticleEmergency radiology2019
Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow-up investigations.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental pulmonary nodules detected on computed tomography pulmonary angiography: prevalence and malignancy outcomes from a Thai tertiary-care center.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Appropriateness of CT Pulmonary Angiography Requests at Croydon University Hospital: An Audit.Cureus · 2025Article
- Beyond pulmonary embolism: Alternative diagnosis and incidental findings on CT pulmonary angiography in sickle cell disease.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
- Low D-dimer in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure: Screening for large vessel diseases in patients with chest symptoms.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Does Adding the Pulmonary Infarction and Right Ventricle to Left Ventricle Diameter Ratio to the Qanadli Index (A Combined Qanadli Index) More Accurately, Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism?The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2023Article
- How Tasmanian Emergency Departments 'Choose Wisely' When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Implementation of the YEARS algorithm to optimise pulmonary embolism diagnostic workup in the emergency department.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Computed Tomography Angiography for Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Western Australia Shows Increasing Use with Decreasing Diagnostic Yield.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparing 'clinical hunch' against clinical decision support systems (PERC rule, wells score, revised Geneva score and YEARS criteria) in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Current use of D-dimer for the exclusion of venous thrombosis in hospitalized patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Use of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Emergency Departments: A Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- CT pulmonary angiography findings in HIV-infected patients referred for suspected pulmonary thrombo-embolic disease.SA journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Determinants of time-to-disposition in patients who underwent CT for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study.BMC emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Variability in practice patterns among emergency physicians in the evaluation of patients with a suspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Emergency radiology · 2020Article
- Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism: definition, causes and implications.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2019Review
- Low Incidence of Symptomatic Thrombotic Events in Adult Patients Hospitalized with Coronavirus 19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- Triaging Patients With Artificial Intelligence for Respiratory Symptoms in Primary Care to Improve Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionComputed tomographic pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) are often ordered to evaluate pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED). The increase use of CTPA has led to an increase in incidental findings, often of low clinical significance. Our objectives were to (1) assess the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings identified in patients evaluated with CTPAs for PE in the ED, (2) evaluate follow-up investigations for these incidental findings, and (3) assess the utility of routine chest X-rays done prior to CTPA.
methodsThis is a historical cohort study of adult patients, presenting to two tertiary care EDs from January-December 2015, evaluated with CTPA for possible PE. Two reviewers' extracted data from electronic CT records in a standardized fashion with inter-rater reliability reported using the kappa statistic. We measured the prevalence of PE and stratified non-PE findings according to alternative diagnoses and incidental findings. Data were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD). Univariate analyses were performed with t test for continuous variables.
resultsA total of 1708 studies were included (mean 62 years (SD 16.7), 56.9% female). PE was found in 233 (13.6%) patients. A total of 223 (13.1%) patients had an incidental finding, the majority of which included pulmonary nodules (n = 83, 37.2%) and adenopathy (n = 26, 11.6%). Of the incidental findings, 197 (88.3%) were non-significant and led to no definitive diagnosis of cancer. In patients who underwent both CTPA and chest X-ray, X-ray reports revealed the same diagnosis in 77% of PE-negative patients without missing a clinically significant incidental finding.
conclusionsIncidental findings are as common as a diagnosis of PE in patients undergoing CTPA. They are rarely clinically significant. Chest radiograph remains a reasonable initial investigation as it can aid in identifying alternative diagnoses especially in the setting of a low pre-test probability for PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30238172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.