Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238156›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2018

Changes in electrophysiological properties of photoreceptors in Periplaneta americana associated with the loss of screening pigment.

Paulus Saari, Esa-Ville Immonen, Joni Kemppainen, Kyösti Heimonen, Marianna Zhukovskaya, Ekaterina Novikova, Andrew S French, Päivi H Torkkeli, Hongxia Liu, Roman V Frolov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulus SaariBiophysics Group, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Esa-Ville ImmonenBiophysics Group, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Joni KemppainenBiophysics Group, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Kyösti HeimonenBiophysics Group, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Marianna ZhukovskayaSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 44 Thorez Pr., Saint Petersburg, 194223, Russia.
Ekaterina NovikovaSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 44 Thorez Pr., Saint Petersburg, 194223, Russia.
Andrew S FrenchDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8190-4084
Päivi H TorkkeliDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8205-7339
Hongxia LiuDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Roman V FrolovBiophysics Group, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. roman.frolov@oulu.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-7431-5297
University of Oulu · FIDalhousie University · CAInstitute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Absence of screening pigment in insect compound eyes has been linked to visual dysfunction. We investigated how its loss in a white-eyed mutant (W-E) alters the photoreceptor electrophysiological properties, opsin gene expression, and the behavior of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of green-sensitive photoreceptors in W-E cockroaches gave reduced membrane capacitance, absolute sensitivity to light, and light-induced currents. Decreased low-pass filtering increased voltage-bump amplitudes in W-E photoreceptors. Intracellular recordings showed that angular sensitivity of W-E photoreceptors had two distinct components: a large narrow component with the same acceptance angle as wild type, plus a relatively small wide component. Information processing was evaluated using Gaussian white-noise modulated light stimulation. In bright light, W-E photoreceptors demonstrated higher signal gain and signal power than wild-type photoreceptors. Expression levels of the primary UV- and green-sensitive opsins were lower and the secondary green-sensitive opsin significantly higher in W-E than in wild-type retinae. In behavioral experiments, W-E cockroaches were significantly less active in dim green light, consistent with the relatively low light sensitivity of their photoreceptors. Overall, these differences can be related to the loss of screening pigment function and to a compensatory decrease in the rhabdomere size in W-E retinae.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCompound Eye, ArthropodElectric CapacitanceGene ExpressionInsect ProteinsIntracellular SpaceMaleMembrane PotentialsMotor ActivityOpsinsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPeriplanetaPhotic StimulationPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebratePigmentationInsect ProteinsOpsinsPotassiumRNA, MessengerCompound eyePeriplaneta americanaPhotoreceptorScreening pigmentWhite-eyed

Identifiers

PMID30238156
OpenAlexW2891323807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.