ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2018
Surgery with curative intent for stage IV gastric cancer: Is it a reality of illusion?
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful Conversion Surgery after Zolbetuximab-Based Chemotherapy for Claudin 18.2-Positive Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination and Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- The Effect of Extended Dissection of Lymph Nodes (D2plus) with Gastrectomy on the Clinical and Oncological Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients, Compared to a Standard Dissection (D2).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of site-specific metastasis in gastric cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- A prognostic scoring system for conversion surgery after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced gastric cancer.Surgery today · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating CD163BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Successful conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer with liver metastases after second-line chemotherapy with ramucirumab and paclitaxel: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Role of CT texture analysis for predicting peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Treatment options for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: experience from a single institution in Korea.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2021Article
- Impact of Palliative Gastrectomy in Patients with Incurable Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer with a complete pathological response to nivolumab: a case report.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.Journal of gastric cancer · 2020Article
- Essential updates 2017/2018: Recent topics in the treatment and research of gastric cancer in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Review
- Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Surgical management of metastatic gastric cancer: moving beyond the guidelines.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019Review
- Surgery with curative intent for stage IV gastric cancer: Is it a reality of illusion?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer with metastases outside of the regional lymph nodes is deemed oncologically unresectable. Nevertheless, some metastatic lesions are technically resectable by applying established surgical techniques such as para-aortic lymphadenectomy and hepatectomy. At the time of compilation of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines version 4, systematic reviews were conducted to see whether it is feasible to make any recommendation to dissect both the primary and metastatic lesions with intent to cure, possibly as part of multimodality treatment. Long-term survivors were found among carefully selected groups of patients both in prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, there is a growing list of publications reporting encouraging outcomes of gastrectomy conducted after exceptionally good response to chemotherapy, usually among patients who underwent R0 resection. This type of surgery is often referred to as conversion surgery. It is sometimes difficult to define a clear borderline between curative surgery scheduled after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the conversion surgery. This review summarizes what we knew after the literature reviews conducted at the time of compiling the Japanese guidelines and in addition reflects some new findings obtained thereafter through clinical trials and retrospective studies. Metastases were divided into three categories based on the major metastatic pathways: lymphatic, hematogenous, and peritoneal. In each of these categories, there were findings that could provide hope for patients with metastatic disease. These findings implied that the surgical technique that we already use could become more useful upon further developments in antineoplastic agents and drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.