Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238022›Full record

ArticleTobacco regulatory science2017

E-cigarettes Warning Labels and Modified Risk Statements: Tests of Messages to Reduce Recreational Use.

Sherri Jean Katz, Bruce Lindgren, Dorothy Hatsukami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco regulatory science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of Conflicting Public Health Guidance on Smokers' and Vapers' E-cigarette Harm Perceptions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  2. Educating the Public on the Health Risks of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes: Results From a US-Based Convenience Sample.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Targeted Versus Nontargeted Communication About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Three Smoker Groups.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of e-Cigarette Packaging as a Health Communications Tool: A Focus Group Study With Adolescents and Adults in England and Scotland.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of Electronic Cigarette Warning Statements Portrayed in YouTube Videos.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sherri Jean KatzHubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Bruce LindgrenCoordinator, Masonic Cancer Center Biostat Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Minnesota.
Dorothy HatsukamiTobacco Research Programs Director, Department of Psychiatry Professor, Associate Director of Cancer Prevention and Control, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
E-Cigarette Warning Labels: Tests of Messages to Reduce Recreational Use Among AdolescentsR03DA043022 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KATZ, SHERRI JEAN · 2017 to 2018
$220k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA043022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe tested how variations of the warning message on e-cigarette packages influenced risk and ambiguity perceptions, and whether including a modified risk statement on the package influenced how the warning label was perceived.

methodA 4 (warning text) × 2 (modified risk statement), plus control, experiment (N = 451) was conducted.

resultsSmoking status, sex, and the language used in the warning statements interacted to influence risk perceptions. For example, non-smoking women perceived e-cigarettes with the FDA text at 30% of the package as riskier than the FDA text at 12-point type. Additionally, including a modified risk statement on the package increased ambiguity among non-smokers, as did an abstract warning label.

conclusionsWhen evaluating the effectiveness of warning label text, it is important to consider smoking status and sex. Additionally, including modified risk statements on the package with the warning label could potentially increase ambiguity among non-smokers.

Indexed as

e-cigarettesmodified risk statementswarning labels

Identifiers

PMID30238022
PMCPMC6141046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.