Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237935›Full record

ReviewCurrent otorhinolaryngology reports2018

Outcome Measures in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Fiona Ting, Claire Hopkins

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current otorhinolaryngology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Outcome Assessment of Conventional Vs. Endoscopic Nasal Septoplasty Using NOSE and SNOT-22 Questionnaires.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  7. Role of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Canadian real-world study of access and clinical results using dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona Ting1ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT UK.
Claire Hopkins1ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT UK.
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and is a high cost burden to both society and patients. There is a variety of objective and subjective outcome measures that exist to assess the effectiveness of interventions. We aim to review current outcome measures available. RECENT

findingsTraditionally, results have focused on objective measures, however, subjective outcome measures are gaining traction as being more important. Outcome measures in chronic rhinosinusitis are currently heterogeneous, thus limiting the impact of meta-analysis of past trial results. The development of a core outcome set may standardize the reporting of outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis. SUMMARY: We outline the outcome measures currently available and discuss a proposed core outcome set that may facilitate further value of research on interventions for CRS in adults.

Indexed as

Chronic rhinosinusitisCore outcome setsOutcome measuresOutcomesPROMs

Identifiers

PMID30237935
PMCPMC6133050
OpenAlexW2887351279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.