Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237903›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2018

Correlation between skin and bone parameters in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A systematic review.

Jean-Charles Aurégan, Catherine Bosser, Morad Bensidhoum, Thierry Bégué, Thierry Hoc

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean-Charles AuréganDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Sud University, France.
Catherine BosserLaboratory of Tribology and System Dynamics, Ecole Centrale Lyon, France.
Morad BensidhoumLaboratory of Bioengineering and Bioimagery for Bone and Articulation, Paris-Diderot University, France.
Thierry BéguéDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Sud University, France.
Thierry HocLaboratory of Tribology and System Dynamics, Ecole Centrale Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin and bone share similarities in terms of biochemical composition.Some authors have hypothesized that their properties could evolve concomitantly with age, allowing the estimation of the parameters of one from those of the other.We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the correlation between skin and bone parameters in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Fourteen studies - including 1974 patients - were included in the review.Three of these studies included two groups of participants - osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic - in order to compare skin parameters between them: two studies found a significant difference between the two groups and one did not.Eleven of these studies included one population of interest and compared its skin and bone parameters in a continuous manner: eight studies compared dermal thickness to bone mineral density (seven found a significant correlation [

Indexed as

ageingbone mineral densityepidemiologymenopauseosteoporosisskin

Identifiers

PMID30237903
PMCPMC6134882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.