Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237899›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Development, acceptability and feasibility of a communication skills training package for therapeutic radiographers to reduce fear of recurrence development in breast cancer patients (FORECAST2).

Mara van Beusekom, Josie Cameron, Carolyn Bedi, Elspeth Banks, Tom Kelsey, Gerry Humphris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03468881 (Development and Feasibility of a Communication Training Package for Therapeutic Radiographers to Manage Emotional Talk With Breast Cancer Patients in Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03468881 unknown statusnot on this map

Development and Feasibility of a Communication Training Package for Therapeutic Radiographers to Manage Emotional Talk With Breast Cancer Patients in Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of St AndrewsRan2018 to 2020Enrolled74ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCommunication Skills Training Package (KEW)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perilla Oil andMethods and protocols · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Emotional talk of patients with breast cancer during review appointments with therapeutic radiographers: effects on fears of cancer recurrence.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mara van Beusekom1School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Josie Cameron2Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Carolyn Bedi2Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Elspeth Banks3National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK.
Tom Kelsey4School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Gerry Humphris1School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
University of St Andrews · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBNational Cancer Research Institute · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients who have been treated for breast cancer experience high levels of fear that the cancer will return. The FORECAST pilot study showed that for a third of the patients, fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) increase during radiotherapy treatment and that conversations with their therapeutic radiographer at the weekly review meetings might help patients manage these concerns. This study aims to develop a communication skills training package (KEW, for 'Know', 'Encourage' and 'Warm-up') for therapeutic radiographers based on the findings of the FORECAST pilot study and on active input from patients and radiographers. This package will be piloted in a single centre to evaluate its acceptability and to prepare for a multi-centre clinical trial.

methodsThe study consists of three phases. In the first phase, patient representatives and therapeutic radiographers participate in Experience-Based Co-Design to identify ways to improve communication during the radiotherapy review. In the second phase, various stakeholders, including members of the Society of Radiographers and of national patient representation groups, are consulted to develop a storyboard for the production of the communication training package. In the third phase, the acceptability and feasibility of the training is evaluated through observations, recruitment rates and follow-up discussions; a fidelity measure is designed; and potential benefits are observed, with patients' fear of cancer recurrence (FCR7) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include a short daily measure of recurrence (FCR3), patients' positive and negative affect (PANAS), perceived empathy from the radiographer (CARE), satisfaction with the review meetings (RISS) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). DISCUSSION: To date, there has been limited research on how communication between therapeutic radiographers and patients during review appointments can help to manage patients' recurrence fears during radiotherapy treatment. A collaborative and participatory approach to the development of a communication skills training will ensure that it is optimally targeted to the needs and preferences of both patients and radiographers. Targeting recurrence fears through communication at this stage, when patients are still in regular contact with healthcare providers, has the potential to reduce the need for complex interventions post-treatment.

trial registrationNRES reference: 18/LO/0669. Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT03468881.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityBreast cancerCo-designCommunicationEmotional regulationFear of cancer recurrence

Identifiers

PMID30237899
PMCPMC6142415
OpenAlexW2890443827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.