Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237898›Full record

ArticleTropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines2018

Molecular surveillance of respiratory viruses with bioaerosol sampling in an airport.

Emily S Bailey, Jessica Y Choi, Juliana Zemke, Myagmarsukh Yondon, Gregory C Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficient replication of influenza D virus in the human airway underscores zoonotic potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influenza D virus infection in China, 2022-2023.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influenza D virus utilizes both 9-Journal of virology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily S Bailey1Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1292-0771
Jessica Y Choi1Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.
Juliana Zemke1Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.
Myagmarsukh Yondon1Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.
Gregory C Gray1Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing that crowded, high-traffic airports and airplanes have been implicated in respiratory disease transmission, we partnered with administrators of Raleigh Durham International Airport (RDU) in conducting a pilot study of aerosol surveillance for respiratory viruses at RDU. From January to March 2018 we used NIOSH 2-stage samplers to collect 150 min aerosol samples in crowded areas at RDU. Four (17%) of the 24 samples were positive for known respiratory pathogens including influenza D virus and adenovirus. These results suggest the feasibility of employing bioaerosol surveillance techniques in public transportation areas, such as airports, as a noninvasive way to detect and characterize novel respiratory viruses.

Indexed as

Air travelBioaerosolEpidemiologyRespiratory viruses

Identifiers

PMID30237898
PMCPMC6142699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.