ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
Patients' perceptions and use of natural health products.
Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- Daily turmeric and ginger beverage consumption attenuates physical menstrual cycle symptoms in sub-elite female footballers: a pilot study.Physical activity and nutrition · 2026Article
- Use and Perceived Helpfulness of Different Intervention Strategies in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Depression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Published Literature on the Contributions of the Natural Health Products (NHPs) Industry to Pharmacovigilance for NHPs.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Orally Administered CBD/CBG Hemp Extract Reduces Severity of Ulcerative Colitis and Pain in a Murine Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Prevalence and Patterns of Use of Natural Health Products and Medicines in New Zealand: A Pilot Study Using an Online Market Research Panel.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Investigating blood-brain barrier penetration and neurotoxicity of natural products for central nervous system drug development.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pharmacovigilance in the Age of Legalized Cannabis: Using Social Media to Monitor Drug-Drug Interactions Between Immunosuppressants and Cannabis-Derived Products.Drug safety · 2025Article
- Patterns of Dietary Supplement Use among GBT2Q Men and Non-Binary Individuals in Canada.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Factors influencing the use of natural health products, in particular for concentration and cognition in Germany.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Beliefs About the Use of Herbs Before and After COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2023Article
- The use of the nutritional supplements during the covid-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2023Article
- Exploration of facilitators and barriers to the regulatory frameworks of dietary and herbal supplements: a scoping review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- Assessment of Knowledge about Traditional Medicine Reveals Overuse as a Potential Risk for Aggravating COVID-19 and Underlying Diseases in Geriatrics and Women's Health in the Saudi Population.Clinics and practice · 2022Article
- The effects of beliefs, knowledge, and attitude on herbal medicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey in Indonesia.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Dietary supplements intake during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational Middle Eastern study.European journal of integrative medicine · 2022Article
- The consumption of nutritional supplements and herbal products for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection among the Saudi population in Riyadh.Clinical nutrition open science · 2021Article
- Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite a lack of good scientific evidence for their benefit, Canadians take a lot of natural health products (NHPs). The objectives of this study were to determine patients' perception of the efficacy, safety and quality of NHPs and to characterize NHP use.
methodsA standardized, 18-question survey was distributed to the general public through a variety of methods.
resultsA total of 326 individuals completed the survey. Eighty-five percent of respondents take 1 or more NHPs. Forty-seven percent agreed/strongly agreed that NHPs are safer than prescription medications and 24% disagreed/strongly disagreed that prescription medications are more effective than NHPs. Three-quarters of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that health care providers should recommend NHPs more often, as most stated they preferred to take an NHP for both a minor ailment (82%) and chronic medical condition (60%). Respondents used 124 different NHPs, most commonly vitamin D, vitamin B and magnesium. Respondents purchased NHPs primarily from health/vitamin stores (66%) and accessed the Internet for information about them (64%). Younger, female respondents were more likely to take NHPs. DISCUSSION: Patients appear to be comfortable foregoing education from health care professionals about the benefits and risks of NHPs. Patients' comfort with self-prescribing NHPs seems to stem from a perception of general efficacy and quality with little to no concern about harm and appears to be strongly influenced by lay sources of information.
conclusionMost respondents take 1 or more NHPs, preferring to use NHPs over prescription medications for minor and chronic health concerns seemingly based on a perception of safety and quality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.