Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237824›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018

Impact of initial temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Parker Hu, Rindi Uhlich, Frank Gleason, Jeffrey Kerby, Patrick Bosarge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Open abdomen in the trauma ICU patient: who? when? why? and what are the outcome results?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parker Hu1Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-6107
Rindi Uhlich3Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.
Frank Gleason3Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.
Jeffrey Kerby1Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.
Patrick Bosarge1Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF HYPERTENSION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007457 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Martin E Young · 1985 to 2026
$8.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Damage control surgery has revolutionized trauma surgery. Use of damage control surgery allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy at the risk of loss of abdominal domain and intra-abdominal complications. Temporary abdominal closure is possible with multiple techniques, the choice of which may affect ability to achieve primary fascial closure and further complication. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy upon admission to an ACS-verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was ability to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization. Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria for inclusion. Primary skin closure (57.7%), ABThera™ VAC system (ABT) (15.1%), Bogota bag (BB) (25.1%), or a modified Barker's vacuum-packing (BVP) (2.1%) were used in the initial laparotomy. Patients receiving skin-only closure had significantly higher rates of primary fascial closure and lower hospital mortality, but also significantly lower mean lactate, base deficit, and requirement for massive transfusion. Between ABT or BB, use of ABT was associated with increased rates of fascial closure. Multivariate regression revealed primary skin closure to be significantly associated with primary fascial closure while BB was associated with failure to achieve fascial closure. Conclusions: Primary skin closure is a viable option in the initial management of the open abdomen, although these patients demonstrated less injury burden in our study. Use of vacuum-assisted dressings continues to be the preferred method for temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery for trauma.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAbdomenAdultAlabamaAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLaparotomyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersABTheraBogota bagDamage control surgeryLoss of domainTemporary abdominal closureVacuum packing

Identifiers

PMID30237824
PMCPMC6139137
OpenAlexW2889886177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.