Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237817›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2018

Radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features influence on local control, enucleation rates, and survival after epiescleral brachytherapy. A 20-year retrospective analysis from a single-institution: part I.

David Miguel, Jesús María de Frutos-Baraja, Francisco López-Lara, María Antonia Saornil, Ciro García-Álvarez, Pilar Alonso, Patricia Diezhandino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment planning considerations forJournal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David MiguelIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Jesús María de Frutos-BarajaIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Francisco López-LaraIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
María Antonia SaornilIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Ciro García-ÁlvarezIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Pilar AlonsoIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Patricia DiezhandinoIntraocular Tumor Unit, Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess influence of the radiobiological doses, tumor, and treatment features on local control, enucleation rates, overall and disease-specific survival rates after brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. MATERIAL AND

methodsLocal control, enucleation, overall and disease-specific survival rates were evaluated on the base of 243 patients from 1996 through 2016, using plaques loaded with iodine sources. Clinical and radiotherapy data were extracted from a dedicated prospective database. Biologically effective dose (BED) was included in survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions. The 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year relative survival rates were estimated, and univariate/multivariate regression models were constructed for predictive factors of each item. Hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval at 95% (CI) were determined.

resultsThe median follow-up was 73.9 months (range, 3-202 months). Cumulative probabilities of survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3, 5, 10 and 15 years were respectively: 96%, 94%, 93%, and 87%, for local control; 93%, 88%, 81%, and 73% for globe preservation; 98%, 93%, 84%, and 73% for overall survival, and 98%, 96%, 92%, and 87% for disease-specific survival. By multivariate analysis, we concluded variables as significant: for local control failure - the longest basal diameter and the juxtapapillary location; for globe preservation failure - the longest basal dimension, the mushroom shape, the location in ciliary body, and the dose to the foveola; for disease-specific survival - the longest basal dimension. Some radiobiological doses were significant in univariate models but not in multivariate ones for the items studied.

conclusionsThe results show as predictive factors of local control, enucleation, and disease-specific survival rates those related with the features of the tumor, specifically the longest basal dimension. There is no clear relation between radiobiological doses or treatment parameters in patients after brachytherapy.

Indexed as

brachytherapydisease-specific survivalenucleationlocal controlradiobiological dosesuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID30237817
PMCPMC6142652
OpenAlexW2891794236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.