ArticleBioinformation2018
Comparative analysis of prokaryotic and eukaryotic transcription factors using machine-learning techniques.
Article in Bioinformation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- E. coli-expressed chicken IL-17A enhances respiratory innate immunity by inducing proinflammatory cytokines and interferons.Poultry science · 2026Article
- The regulation of transcription elongation in embryonic stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The DNA-protein interactions play vital roles in the central dogma of molecular biology. Proper interactions between DNA and protein would lead to the onset of various biological phenomena like transcription, translation, and replication. However, the mechanisms of these well-known processes vary between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. The exact molecular mechanisms of these processes are unknown. Therefore, it is of interest to report the comparative estimate of the different properties of the DNA binding proteins from prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. We analyzed the different sequence-based features such as the frequency of amino acids and amino acid groups in the proteins of prokaryotes and eukaryotes by statistical measures. The general pattern of differences between the various DNA binding proteins for the development of a prediction system to discriminate between these proteins between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is documented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.