Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237446›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2018

Eicosapantaenoic acid treatment based on the EPA/AA ratio in patients with coronary artery disease: follow-up data from the Tochigi Ryomo EPA/AA Trial in Coronary Artery Disease (TREAT-CAD) study.

Shichiro Abe, Hiroyuki Sugimura, Shintaro Watanabe, Yoshiaki Murakami, Katsuhito Ebisawa, Tatsuya Ioka, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Toshiaki Ando, Kaori Kono, Teruo Inoue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Omega-3 (Nutrients · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shichiro AbeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Hiroyuki SugimuraDepartment of Cardiology, Nikko Medical Center, Dokkyo Medical University, Nikko, Japan.
Shintaro WatanabeDepartment of Cardiology, Sano Kousei General Hospital, Sano, Japan.
Yoshiaki MurakamiDepartment of Cardiology, Haga Red Cross Hospital, Mooka, Japan.
Katsuhito EbisawaDepartment of Cardiology, Tochigi Medical Center Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan.
Tatsuya IokaDepartment of Cardiology, Utsunomiya Memorial Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology, Koga Hospital, Koga, Japan.
Toshiaki AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kan-etsu Central Hospital, Takasaki, Japan.
Kaori KonoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Teruo InoueDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan. inouet@dokkyomed.ac.jp.
Dokkyo Medical University · JPKanetsu Hospital · JPKoga Hospital · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JPSendai Kousei Hospital · JPTochigi Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) administration has been reported to decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events, and the serum EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio has been identified as a potential new risk marker for coronary artery disease (CAD). The present study aimed to investigate the value of EPA treatment based on the EPA/AA ratio at baseline. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcome data from 149 CAD patients with a baseline EPA/AA ratio ≤ 0.4 who had received purified EPA (EPA group) or not (no EPA group) and CAD patients with an EPA/AA ratio > 0.4 who had not received EPA (control group). The baseline EPA/AA ratios were similar in the EPA and no EPA groups and were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.0001). The EPA/AA ratio significantly increased in the EPA group (P < 0.0001) and the no EPA group (P < 0.001) but not in the control group. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death tended to be lower in the EPA group (log-rank test: P = 0.07). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the cut-off value of the target EPA/AA ratio after EPA treatment for all-cause death was 1.23 (AUC = 0.85, P = 0.016). These results suggest that EPA treatment may improve the long-term prognosis in CAD patients with an EPA/AA ratio ≤ 0.4 and that an EPA/AA ratio > 1.2 may be an appropriate EPA treatment target value to reduce mortality.

Indexed as

AgedArachidonic AcidBiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseEicosapentaenoic AcidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateArachidonic AcidBiomarkersEicosapentaenoic AcidClinical outcomesCoronary artery diseaseEicosapentaenoic acidEPA/AA ratio

Identifiers

PMID30237446
OpenAlexW2891387948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.