Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237355›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2018

Ancient steroids establish the Ediacaran fossil

Ilya Bobrovskiy, Janet M Hope, Andrey Ivantsov, Benjamin J Nettersheim, Christian Hallmann, Jochen J Brocks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of Sensory Receptors.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A mathematical description of fossilization.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Why Should Natural Principles Be Simple?Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The tempo of Ediacaran evolution.Science advances · 2021
    Article
  20. The developmental biology ofScience advances · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilya BobrovskiyResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. ilya.bobrovskiy@anu.edu.au jochen.brocks@anu.edu.au.
Janet M HopeResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Andrey IvantsovBorissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117997, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-7431
Benjamin J NettersheimMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena 07745, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-0689
Christian HallmannMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena 07745, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-7371
Jochen J BrocksResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. ilya.bobrovskiy@anu.edu.au jochen.brocks@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-8744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enigmatic Ediacara biota (571 million to 541 million years ago) represents the first macroscopic complex organisms in the geological record and may hold the key to our understanding of the origin of animals. Ediacaran macrofossils are as "strange as life on another planet" and have evaded taxonomic classification, with interpretations ranging from marine animals or giant single-celled protists to terrestrial lichens. Here, we show that lipid biomarkers extracted from organically preserved Ediacaran macrofossils unambiguously clarify their phylogeny.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBiomarkersBiotaFossilsGeologic SedimentsInvertebratesPaleontologyRussiaSteroidsBiomarkersSteroids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.