ArticleBiology open2018
Axial morphology and 3D neurocranial kinematics in suction-feeding fishes.
Article in Biology open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mechanical perspective on suction feeding in fishes.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Review
- Head posture impacts mammalian hyoid position and suprahyoid muscle length: implication for swallowing biomechanics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Beam theory predicts muscle deformation and vertebral curvature during feeding in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- Emerging biological insights enabled by high-resolution 3D motion data: promises, perspectives and pitfalls.The Journal of experimental biology · 2023Article
- A new conceptual framework for the musculoskeletal biomechanics and physiology of ray-finned fishes.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2022Article
- A neck-like vertebral motion in fish.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- A biomechanical paradox in fish: swimming and suction feeding produce orthogonal strain gradients in the axial musculature.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Extreme Morphology, Functional Trade-offs, and Evolutionary Dynamics in a Clade of Open-Ocean Fishes (Perciformes: Bramidae).Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Dual function of epaxial musculature for swimming and suction feeding in largemouth bass.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Bifunctional Role of the Sternohyoideus Muscle During Suction Feeding in Striped Surfperch,Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Three-dimensional movements of the pectoral fin during yaw turns in the Pacific spiny dogfish,Biology open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many suction-feeding fish use neurocranial elevation to expand the buccal cavity for suction feeding, a motion necessarily accompanied by the dorsal flexion of joints in the axial skeleton. How much dorsal flexion the axial skeleton accommodates and where that dorsal flexion occurs may vary with axial skeletal morphology, body shape and the kinematics of neurocranial elevation. We measured three-dimensional neurocranial kinematics in three species with distinct body forms: laterally compressed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.