Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237036›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Distinct modes of functional connectivity induced by movie-watching.

Murat Demirtaş, Adrian Ponce-Alvarez, Matthieu Gilson, Patric Hagmann, Dante Mantini, Viviana Betti, Gian Luca Romani, Karl Friston, Maurizio Corbetta, Gustavo Deco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain-AI Alignment in Naturalistic Movies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Linking fast and slow: The case for generative models.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Murat DemirtaşN3 Division, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 40 Temple Street, New Haven, 06511, Connecticut, USA; Center for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona, 08018, Spain. Electronic address: murat.demirtas@yale.edu.
Adrian Ponce-AlvarezCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona, 08018, Spain.
Matthieu GilsonCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona, 08018, Spain.
Patric HagmannDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dante MantiniResearch Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium; Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital Foundation, via Alberoni 70, 30126, Venice Lido, Italy.
Viviana BettiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Santa Lucia and Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00142, Rome, Italy.
Gian Luca RomaniInstitute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Karl FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartment of Neuroscience and Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Italy; Departments of Neurology, Radiology, Anatomy of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona, 08018, Spain; Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona, 08010, Spain; Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.

Funding

Stroke, Brain Networks, and BehaviorR01NS095741 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question in systems neuroscience is how endogenous neuronal activity self-organizes during particular brain states. Recent neuroimaging studies have demonstrated systematic relationships between resting-state and task-induced functional connectivity (FC). In particular, continuous task studies, such as movie watching, speak to alterations in coupling among cortical regions and enhanced fluctuations in FC compared to the resting-state. This suggests that FC may reflect systematic and large-scale reorganization of functionally integrated responses while subjects are watching movies. In this study, we characterized fluctuations in FC during resting-state and movie-watching conditions. We found that the FC patterns induced systematically by movie-watching can be explained with a single principal component. These condition-specific FC fluctuations overlapped with inter-subject synchronization patterns in occipital and temporal brain regions. However, unlike inter-subject synchronization, condition-specific FC patterns were characterized by increased correlations within frontal brain regions and reduced correlations between frontal-parietal brain regions. We investigated these condition-specific functional variations as a shorter time scale, using time-resolved FC. The time-resolved FC showed condition-specificity over time; notably when subjects watched both the same and different movies. To explain self-organisation of global FC through the alterations in local dynamics, we used a large-scale computational model. We found that condition-specific reorganization of FC could be explained by local changes that engendered changes in FC among higher-order association regions, mainly in frontal and parietal cortices.

Indexed as

Motion PicturesAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPrincipal Component AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30237036
PMCPMC6248881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.