Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237034›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Background connectivity between frontal and sensory cortex depends on task state, independent of stimulus modality.

Abdurahman S Elkhetali, Leland L Fleming, Ryan J Vaden, Rodolphe Nenert, Jane E Mendle, Kristina M Visscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdurahman S ElkhetaliUniversity of Utah School of Medicine Department of Neurology, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Leland L FlemingUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine Department of Neurobiology, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Ryan J VadenUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine Department of Neurobiology, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Rodolphe NenertDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Jane E MendleDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Kristina M VisscherUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine Department of Neurobiology, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. Electronic address: kmv@uab.edu.

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Oliver W Gramlich · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) UL1UL1TR000165 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2012 to 2013
$9.6M
Changes in Visual Cortical Connectivity Following Central Visual Field LossU01EY025858 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI VISSCHER, KRISTINA · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000165NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain has the ability to process identical information differently depending on the task. In order to perform a given task, the brain must select and react to the appropriate stimuli while ignoring other irrelevant stimuli. The dynamic nature of environmental stimuli and behavioral intentions requires an equally dynamic set of responses within the brain. Collectively, these responses act to set up and maintain states needed to perform a given task. However, the mechanisms that allow for setting up and maintaining a task state are not fully understood. Prior evidence suggests that one possible mechanism for maintaining a task state may be through altering 'background connectivity,' connectivity that exists independently of the trials of a task. Although previous studies have suggested that background connectivity contributes to a task state, these studies have typically not controlled for stimulus characteristics, or have focused primarily on relationships among areas involved with visual sensory processing. In the present study we examined background connectivity during tasks involving both visual and auditory stimuli. We examined the connectivity profiles of both visual and auditory sensory cortex that allow for selection of task-relevant stimuli, demonstrating the existence of a potentially universal pattern of background connectivity underlying attention to a stimulus. Participants were presented with simultaneous auditory and visual stimuli and were instructed to respond to only one, while ignoring the other. Using functional MRI, we observed task-based modulation of the background connectivity profile for both the auditory and visual cortex to certain brain regions. There was an increase in background connectivity between the task-relevant sensory cortex and control areas in the frontal cortex. This increase in synchrony when receiving the task-relevant stimulus as compared to the task irrelevant stimulus may be maintaining paths for passing information within the cortex. These task-based modulations of connectivity occur independently of stimuli and could be one way the brain sets up and maintains a task state.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAttentional setAttentional stateAuditory cortexBackground connectivityCognitive controlIntrinsic activityTask setTask stateTrial-independentVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30237034
PMCPMC8415012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.