Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30237021›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2019

Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade.

Paolo Capogrosso, Emily A Vertosick, Nicole E Benfante, James A Eastham, Peter J Scardino, Andrew J Vickers, John P Mulhall

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07348367 (A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07348367 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2026 to 2028Enrolled160ConditionsProstatectomyArmsRadical Prostatectomy, Precision Prostatectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo CapogrossoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.capogrosso@gmail.com.
Emily A VertosickMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole E BenfanteMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
James A EasthamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter J ScardinoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew J VickersMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
John P MulhallMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe last decade has seen several advances in radical prostatectomy (RP) technique and post-RP care that are relevant to erectile function (EF) recovery.

objectiveWe examined whether these practice changes have led to observed improvements in EF rates over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe identified 2364 patients treated with either open or minimally-invasive RP at a single academic center in 2008-2015. To mitigate confounding by the surgical learning curve, only patients treated by surgeons who performed at least 100 procedures were considered.

interventionEF before and after RP was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function 6 (IIEF-6), with recovery defined as IIEF-6 ≥24. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We analyzed EF recovery rates of patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing surgery and free from adjuvant/salvage treatment at the time of EF assessment. Local polynomial regression analyses explored changes in the outcomes over time. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the influence of year of surgery on baseline variables and EF recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We observed a significant decrease over time of the EF recovery rates at both 12 and 24mo post-RP (all p=0.01). However, patient's age at surgery increased over time (mean increase of 0.5 per year; p<0.01), with a resultant increase in risk of comorbidity (odds ratio [OR]=1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.15; p=0.008) and thus decrease in baseline IIEF-6 score (0.35 points per year; p=0.0003). After accounting for baseline and pathological characteristics, urinary function, and type of surgery in a multivariable analysis, year of surgery was not associated with EF recovery (12mo: OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, p=0.4; 24mo: OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, p=0.3).

conclusionsFindings from a high-volume center suggest that, despite the advancements in surgical and postoperative care, EF outcomes after RP have not improved over the last decade. Additional strategies are required to improve EF recovery after RP. PATIENT SUMMARY: The probability of regaining potency after surgery for prostate cancer did not improve over the last decade; more efforts are needed to improve patient's care after radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Penile ErectionAgedErectile DysfunctionHospitals, High-VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeErectile functionInternational Index of Erectile FunctionPenile rehabilitationProstate cancerRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID30237021
PMCPMC6339580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.