ArticleEuropean urology2019
Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade.
Article in European urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07348367 (A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of Combination Therapies vs Monotherapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- A prospective randomized controlled study on scheduled PDE5i and vacuum erectile devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve sparing prostatectomy.Asian journal of andrologyTrial
- Implantable pelvic neurostimulators to restore erectile function: from concept to practice.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Late Functional Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Impact of Baseline and Perioperative Risk Factors.Cancers · 2026Article
- AI model predicts patient outcomes from surgical gestures and provides insights into explainability.npj digital surgery · 2026Article
- Assessing operative variability in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) through AI.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Navigating Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Contemporary Perspectives and Future Trajectories in the Canadian Context.Journal of endourology · 2025Review
- Early versus late penile prosthesis surgery: a cross-sectional real-life study unveiling predictive factors.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment and therapeutic advances: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Outcomes after precision prostatectomy: safety, efficacy and transference of skills.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile function rehabilitation in patients undergoing nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a scoping review.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2024Article
- Reviving intimacy: Penile rehabilitation strategies for men after prostate cancer treatment.Prostate international · 2023Review
- Navigating through the Controversies and Emerging Paradigms in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Bridging the Gap from Classic RCTs to Modern Population-Based Pilot Programs.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of a Red-Light Controllable Nitric Oxide Releaser for Neurogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Study Using a Rat Model of Cavernous Nerve Injury.The world journal of men's health · 2023Article
- Radical Prostatectomy and Anatomical Controversies: The Urethral Sphincter and the Elusive Continence Mechanisms.Cancers · 2023Article
- Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.The journal of sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Erectile Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivors and Current Management Options.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Rats, Neuregulins and Radical Prostatectomy: A Conceptual Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The assessment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy using pudendal somatosensory evoked potential.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe last decade has seen several advances in radical prostatectomy (RP) technique and post-RP care that are relevant to erectile function (EF) recovery.
objectiveWe examined whether these practice changes have led to observed improvements in EF rates over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe identified 2364 patients treated with either open or minimally-invasive RP at a single academic center in 2008-2015. To mitigate confounding by the surgical learning curve, only patients treated by surgeons who performed at least 100 procedures were considered.
interventionEF before and after RP was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function 6 (IIEF-6), with recovery defined as IIEF-6 ≥24. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We analyzed EF recovery rates of patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing surgery and free from adjuvant/salvage treatment at the time of EF assessment. Local polynomial regression analyses explored changes in the outcomes over time. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the influence of year of surgery on baseline variables and EF recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We observed a significant decrease over time of the EF recovery rates at both 12 and 24mo post-RP (all p=0.01). However, patient's age at surgery increased over time (mean increase of 0.5 per year; p<0.01), with a resultant increase in risk of comorbidity (odds ratio [OR]=1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.15; p=0.008) and thus decrease in baseline IIEF-6 score (0.35 points per year; p=0.0003). After accounting for baseline and pathological characteristics, urinary function, and type of surgery in a multivariable analysis, year of surgery was not associated with EF recovery (12mo: OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, p=0.4; 24mo: OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.91-1.03, p=0.3).
conclusionsFindings from a high-volume center suggest that, despite the advancements in surgical and postoperative care, EF outcomes after RP have not improved over the last decade. Additional strategies are required to improve EF recovery after RP. PATIENT SUMMARY: The probability of regaining potency after surgery for prostate cancer did not improve over the last decade; more efforts are needed to improve patient's care after radical prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.