ReviewDNA repair2018
Mutational spectra and mutational signatures: Insights into cancer aetiology and mechanisms of DNA damage and repair.
Review in DNA repair, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- UBE2C at the crossroads of cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response in cancer.Cell biology and toxicology · 2026Review
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of mutational signatures and corresponding driver genes in cervical cancer from Xinjiang.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Integrating liquid biopsy and mutational signatures to advance precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Evolutionary dynamics of early and late mutational signatures in metastatic cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Severity of effect considerations regarding the use of mutation as a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment: A report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Review
- Genome-scale multi-organ analysis of mutagenic effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde in Sprague Dawley rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identification of Hot and Cold Regions for Mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli tdk Gene: A Catalog of Mutational Sites.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Investigating the origins of the mutational signatures in cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- Anatomy of a hotspot: Cisplatin hotspots in the tdk gene of Escherichia coli.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2024Article
- CarcSeq detection of lorcaserin-induced clonal expansion of Pik3ca H1047R mutants in rat mammary tissue.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024Article
- Article
- AI and ML-based risk assessment of chemicals: predicting carcinogenic risk from chemical-induced genomic instability.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- Topography of mutational signatures in human cancer.Cell reports · 2023Article
- SNV/indel hypermutator phenotype in biallelic RAD51C variant: Fanconi anemia.Human genetics · 2023Article
- Mass spectrometry-based assays for assessing replicative bypass and repair of DNA alkylation in cells.RSC advances · 2023Review
- SNV/indel hypermutator phenotype in biallelic RAD51C variant - Fanconi anemia.Research square · 2023Article
- Accumulation of STR-Loci Aberrations in Subclones of Jurkat Cell Line as a Model of Tumor Clonal Evolution.Genes · 2023Article
- DNA damage and somatic mutations in mammalian cells after irradiation with a nail polish dryer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Unveiling the interplay between mutational signatures and tumor microenvironment: a pan-cancer analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reporter gene assays, in which a single mutation from each experiment can contribute to the assembly of a mutation spectrum for an agent, have provided the basis for understanding the mutational processes induced by mutagenic agents and for providing clues to the origins of mutations in human tumours. More recently exome and whole genome sequencing of human tumours has revealed distinct patterns of mutation that could provide additional clues for the causative origins of cancer. This can be tested by examining the mutational signatures induced in experimental systems by putative cancer-causing agents. Such signatures are now being generated in vitro in a number of different mutagen-exposed cellular systems. Results reveal that mutagens induce characteristic mutation signatures that, in some cases, match signatures found in human tumours. Proof of principle has been established with mutational signatures generated by simulated sunlight and aristolochic acid, which match those signatures found in human melanomas and urothelial cancers, respectively. In an analysis of somatic mutations in cancers for which tobacco smoking confers an elevated risk, it was found that smoking is associated with increased mutation burdens of multiple different mutational signatures, which contribute to different extents in different tissues. One of these signatures, mainly found in tissues directly exposed to tobacco smoke, is attributable to misreplication of DNA damage caused by tobacco carcinogens. Others likely reflect indirect activation of DNA editing by APOBEC cytidine deaminases and of an endogenous clock-like mutational process. The results are consistent with the proposition that smoking increases cancer risk by increasing the somatic mutation load although direct evidence for this mechanism is lacking in some cancer types. Thus, next generation sequencing of exomes or whole genomes is providing new insights into processes underlying the causes of human cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.