Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30236548›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2018

Caregiver Perceptions about their Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy for Children with Medical Complexity.

Savithri Nageswaran, Shannon L Golden, W Adam Gower, Nancy M P King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shared decision-making experiences in child long-term ventilation: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating caregiver-clinician communication for tracheostomy placement in the neonatal intensive care unit: a qualitative inquiry.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk of death at home or on hospital readmission after discharge with pediatric tracheostomy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Parental Conflict, Regret, and Short-term Impact on Quality of Life in Tracheostomy Decision-Making.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savithri NageswaranDepartment of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. Electronic address: snageswa@wakehealth.edu.
Shannon L GoldenDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
W Adam GowerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Nancy M P KingDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Health-care Providers Roles in Decision Making in Pediatric Palliative CareR21NR013272 · NINR · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NAGESWARAN, SAVITHRI · 2013 to 2014
$405k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR013272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the perceptions of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) about their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their children, in particular the satisfaction with their decision. STUDY

designIn this qualitative study conducted in western North Carolina between 2013 and 2014, we interviewed 56 caregivers of 41 CMC who had received tracheostomies in the past 5 years. Three of the CMC were deceased at the time of the interview; 8 were decannulated. In-depth interviews (35 English, 6 Spanish) were conducted, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We used ATLAS.ti software to manage data and identified themes related to caregiver perceptions about tracheostomy decision.

resultsWe found that caregivers often chose tracheostomy because extending the lives of their children and being able to care for them at home were important. Caregivers reported the many benefits of tracheostomy including improvement in respiratory symptoms, physical and developmental health, quality of life, and means to provide medical care quickly when needed. There were negative effects of tracheostomy such as mucous plugs, excessive secretions, accidental decannulation necessitating emergency tracheostomy tube change, and the increased infection risk. Providing medical care for CMC with tracheostomy at home was difficult, but improved over time. Caregivers were generally satisfied with their decision to pursue tracheostomy for their CMC.

conclusionsDecisional satisfaction with tracheostomy for CMC is high. In counseling caregivers about tracheostomy, clinicians should present both the benefits and risks. Future studies should quantify the outcomes described in this study.

Indexed as

Decision MakingTracheostomyAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesDeathFemaleGrandparentsHome Care ServicesHumansInfantMaleMiddle Ageddecision-makinglife-sustaining treatmentsoutcomespediatrics

Identifiers

PMID30236548
PMCPMC6252133
OpenAlexW2891570723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.