Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30236531›Full record

ReviewAntiviral research2018

MERS: Progress on the global response, remaining challenges and the way forward.

FAO-OIE-WHO MERS Technical Working Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antiviral research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Silver nanoparticles as a potential treatment against SARS-CoV-2: A review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Natural and nature-inspired stilbenoids as antiviral agents.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Overview of lethal human coronaviruses.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. Middle East respiratory syndrome.Lancet (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

FAO-OIE-WHO MERS Technical Working Group
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITWorld Health Organization · CHInstitut Pasteur · FROrganisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale · FR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes progress in research on Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) since a FAO-OIE-WHO Global Technical Meeting held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva on 25-27 September 2017. The meeting reviewed the latest scientific findings and identified and prioritized the global activities necessary to prevent, manage and control the disease. Critical needs for research and technical guidance identified during the meeting have been used to update the WHO R&D MERS-CoV Roadmap for diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines and a broader public health research agenda. Since the 2017 meeting, progress has been made on several key actions in animal populations, at the animal/human interface and in human populations. This report also summarizes the latest scientific studies on MERS since 2017, including data from more than 50 research studies examining the presence of MERS-CoV infection in dromedary camels.

Indexed as

Public HealthAnimalsCamelusClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPhylogenyViral VaccinesWorld Health OrganizationZoonosesViral VaccinesAnimal-human interfaceDromedary camelsMERS-CoVResearchVaccineZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID30236531
PMCPMC7113883
OpenAlexW2892294485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.