Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30236379›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2018

Effectiveness of catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination on incident cervical neoplasia in a US health-care setting: a population-based case-control study.

Michael J Silverberg, Wendy A Leyden, Jennifer O Lam, Steven E Gregorich, Megan J Huchko, Shalini Kulasingam, Miriam Kuppermann, Karen K Smith-McCune, George F Sawaya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sociodemographics, behaviour and knowledge of first South African HPV-vaccine recipients.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J SilverbergDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA. Electronic address: michael.j.silverberg@kp.org.
Wendy A LeydenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jennifer O LamDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Steven E GregorichDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Megan J HuchkoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Shalini KulasingamDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Miriam KuppermannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Karen K Smith-McCuneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
George F SawayaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente · USDuke University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Using comparative effectiveness analyses to optimize cervical cancer screeningR01CA169093 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SAWAYA, GEORGE F · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe population effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) catch-up vaccination, defined in the USA as first vaccination at ages 13-26 years, has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer (CIN2+ and CIN3+) by prior HPV vaccination status, age at first dose, and number of doses in women participating in a screening programme within a large integrated health-care system.

methodsWe performed a nested case-control study of women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (an integrated health-care delivery system in California, USA). Cases were women with CIN2+ or CIN3+ confirmed by histology between Jan 1, 1995, and June 30, 2014, and incidence density-selected controls were age-matched women without CIN2+ or CIN3+ at the time each case occurred. For each case, we randomly selected five controls. Cases and controls were aged 26 years or younger when the HPV quadrivalent vaccine became available in 2006. Rate ratios (RRs) from conditional logistic regression were estimated by age at time of first HPV quadrivalent vaccine dose (14-17 years, 18-20 years, and ≥21 years), and number of doses (one, two, and three or more doses) compared with no prior vaccination, with adjustment for smoking, hormonal contraceptive prescription, race or ethnicity, sexually transmitted infections, immunosuppression, parity, and number of outpatient visits.

findings4357 incident CIN2+ cases and 21 773 matched controls were included in the study. Of these, 1849 were incident CIN3+ cases with 9242 matched controls. The youngest age at time of first vaccination was 14 years. One or more HPV vaccine doses conferred protection against CIN2+ (RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·73-0·93) and CIN3+ (0·77, 0·64-0·94). We found the strongest protection against CIN2+ in women who had received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·52, 0·36-0·74) or aged 18-20 years (0·65, 0·49-0·88). No significant protection was found in women aged 21 years or older at time of first dose (0·94, 0·81-1·09). Inferences were similar for CIN3+, but with stronger effects for women who received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·27, 0·13-0·56) or aged 18-20 years (0·59, 0·36-0·97).

interpretationCatch-up quadrivalent HPV vaccination with three doses was effective against CIN2+ and CIN3+ in girls and women aged 14-20 years at time of first vaccine dose but not for women aged 21 years and older at first dose.

fundingUS National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization SchedulePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30236379
PMCPMC6152835
OpenAlexW2886883561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.