ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018
Categorization of post-cardiac arrest patients according to the pattern of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography after return of spontaneous circulation.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest: evidence review and institutional protocol proposal.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Review
- Early-Phase Computed Tomography Bowel Diameter and Neurological Outcomes Post-Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- Development and validation of prediction models for death within 6 months after cardiac arrest.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Prognosis of consciousness disorders in the intensive care unit.Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2023Review
- Recent applications of quantitative electroencephalography in adult intensive care units: a comprehensive review.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- The impact of age and electrode position on amplitude-integrated EEGs in children from 1 month to 17 years of age.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Predicting early recovery of consciousness after cardiac arrest supported by quantitative electroencephalography.Resuscitation · 2021Observational
- Targeted temperature management and early neuro-prognostication after cardiac arrest.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021Review
- Characterization of aEEG During Sleep and Wakefulness in Healthy Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography: It's Not Just for Babies.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020Article
- Electroencephalography: Clinical Applications During the Perioperative Period.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- aEEG Use in Pediatric Critical Care-An Online Survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Geographical Differences and the National Meeting Effect in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: A JCS-ReSS Study Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Amplitude-Integrated EEG for Neurological Assessment and Seizure Detection in a German Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Response to "Categorization of post-cardiac arrest patients according to the pattern of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography after return of spontaneous circulation".Critical care (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous electroencephalography (cEEG), interpreted by an experienced neurologist, has been reported to be useful in predicting neurological outcome in adult patients post cardiac arrest. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a type of quantitative EEG and is easily interpreted by a non-neurologist. A few studies have shown the effectiveness of aEEG in prognostication among adult patients post cardiac arrest. In this study, we hypothesized that the pattern of aEEG after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) could successfully categorize patients post cardiac arrest according to their expected neurological outcome.
methodsWe assessed the comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received targeted temperature management with midazolam-based sedation and were monitored with aEEG at our tertiary emergency care center from January 2013 to June 2017. We categorized the patients into categories 1 (C1) to 4 (C4). C1 included patients who regained continuous normal voltage (CNV) within 12 h post ROSC, C2 included those who recovered CNV 12-36 h post ROSC, C3 included those who did not recover CNV before 36 h post ROSC, and C4 included those who had burst suppression at any time post ROSC. We evaluated the outcomes of neurological function for each category at hospital discharge. A good outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category of 1 or 2.
resultsA total of 61 patients were assessed (median age, 60 years), among whom 42 (70%) had an initial shockable rhythm, and 52 (85%) had cardiac etiology. Of all 61 patients, 40 (66%) survived to hospital discharge and 27 (44%) had a good neurological outcome. Of 20 patients in C1, 19 (95%) had a good outcome, while the percentage dropped to 57% among C2 patients. No patients in C3 or C4 had a good outcome. Three patients could not be classified into any category.
conclusionsThe pattern of aEEG during the early post-cardiac-arrest period can successfully categorize patients according to their neurological prognoses and could be used as a potential guide to customize post-cardiac-arrest care for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.