The relationship between the decrease in haemoglobin concentration and the volume of fluids administered during resuscitation from septic shock may not be so "weak".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging-guided surgery using cRGD-ZW800 to improve surgical resection margins in oral cancer: a phase I/II feasibility trial.Nature communications · 2026
   Trial
2. Deep embedded clustering generalisability and adaptation for integrating mixed datatypes: two critical care cohorts.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
3. A Quantitative Approach to Dilutional Anemia.Journal of hematology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Haemoglobin concentration and volume of intravenous fluids in septic shock in the ARISE trial.2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as