Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30236062›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2018

Urine cultures in a long-term care facility (LTCF): time for improvement.

J Haaijman, E E Stobberingh, L W van Buul, C M P M Hertogh, H Horninge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection with miniaturised point-of-care cultivation on a dipstick.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics ofFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  6. RecurrentAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J HaaijmanRiver Region Elderly Care Centers (SZR), Burgemeester Meslaan 49, 4003CA, Tiel, The Netherlands. jhaaijman@szr.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-4465
E E StobberinghFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life sciences, Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
L W van BuulAmsterdam Public Health Research institute and Department of General Practice & Old Age Medicine, VU University Medical Center, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C M P M HertoghAmsterdam Public Health Research institute and Department of General Practice & Old Age Medicine, VU University Medical Center, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H HorningeRiver Region Elderly Care Centers (SZR), Burgemeester Meslaan 49, 4003CA, Tiel, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent infections in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Numerous studies have described the problem of inadequate UTI diagnosis and treatment. We assessed the role of urine cultures in the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs in a LTCF.

methodsIn a 370-bed non-academic LTCF a retrospective assessment of antibiotic (AB) prescriptions for UTIs and urine cultures was performed from July 2014 to January 2016. The reasons why physicians, including 11 nursing home physicians and 2 junior doctors, ordered urine cultures were recorded using questionnaires.

resultsDuring the study period, 378 residents were prescribed 1672 AB courses; 803 were for UTIs. One hundred and fifty-five urine cultures were obtained from 135 residents; 66 of these cultures were performed on the same day as ABs were prescribed (8% of all prescriptions for UTI), while 89 were not. There was a discrepancy between the actions that seemed logical based on the culture results and the actions that were actually taken in 75% of the cases. In these cases, initial AB treatment was not adjusted when the isolated microorganism was resistant to the AB prescribed, the urine culture was positive and no ABs had previously been administered, or ABs were prescribed and no microorganism was isolated. The most frequent reason for ordering a urine culture was to confirm the diagnosis of a UTI.

conclusionIn the majority of patients, AB therapy was not adjusted when the urine culture results suggested it may be appropriate. The physicians were erroneously convinced that UTIs could be diagnosed by a positive urine culture.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSkilled Nursing FacilitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsLong-term care facilitiesUrinary tract infectionUrine cultures

Identifiers

PMID30236062
PMCPMC6149184
OpenAlexW2889974401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.