Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30236058›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Root inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum 76A enhances tomato plants adaptation to salt stress under low N conditions.

Michael James Van Oosten, Emilio Di Stasio, Valerio Cirillo, Silvia Silletti, Valeria Ventorino, Olimpia Pepe, Giampaolo Raimondi, Albino Maggio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metabolites fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Biofertilizer microorganisms accompanying pathogenic attributes: a potential threat.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael James Van OostenDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Emilio Di StasioDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Valerio CirilloDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Silvia SillettiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Valeria VentorinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Olimpia PepeDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Giampaolo RaimondiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy.
Albino MaggioDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, Portici, Italy. almaggio@unina.it.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 727929Horizon 2020 FP7-KBBE-2012-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emerging roles of rhizobacteria in improving plant nutrition and stress protection have great potential for sustainable use in saline soils. We evaluated the function of the salt-tolerant strain Azotobacter chroococcum 76A as stress protectant in an important horticultural crop, tomato. Specifically we hypothesized that treatment of tomato plants with A. chroococcum 76A could improve plant performance under salinity stress and sub-optimal nutrient regimen.

resultsInoculation of Micro Tom tomato plants with A. chroococcum 76A increased numerous growth parameters and also conferred protective effects under both moderate (50 mM NaCl) and severe (100 mM NaCl) salt stresses. These benefits were mostly observed under reduced nutrient regimen and were less appreciable in optimal nitrogen conditions. Therefore, the efficiency of A. chroococcum 76A was found to be dependent on the nutrient status of the rhizosphere. The expression profiles of LEA genes indicated that A. chroococcum 76A treated plants were more responsive to stress stimuli when compared to untreated controls. However, transcript levels of key nitrogen assimilation genes revealed that the optimal nitrogen regimen, in combination with the strain A. chroococcum 76A, may have saturated plant's ability to assimilate nitrogen.

conclusionsRoots inoculation with A. chroococcum 76A tomato promoted tomato plant growth, stress tolerance and nutrient assimilation efficiency under moderate and severe salinity. Inoculation with beneficial bacteria such as A. chroococcum 76A may be an ideal solution for low-input systems, where environmental constraints and limited chemical fertilization may affect the potential yield.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAzotobacterGene Expression Regulation, PlantNitrogenPlant LeavesPlant RootsRhizosphereSalt ToleranceSolanum lycopersicumSymbiosisNitrogenAzotobacter chroococcumMicro tomPlant nutritionRhizobacteriaSalinityTomato

Identifiers

PMID30236058
PMCPMC6149061
OpenAlexW2891763860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.