Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30235846›Full record

ArticleMembranes2018

1D Mathematical Modelling of Non-Stationary Ion Transfer in the Diffusion Layer Adjacent to an Ion-Exchange Membrane in Galvanostatic Mode.

Aminat Uzdenova, Anna Kovalenko, Makhamet Urtenov, Victor Nikonenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aminat UzdenovaDepartment of Computer Science and Computational Mathematics, Karachaevo-Cherkessky State University Named after U.D. Aliev, Karachaevsk 369202, Russia. uzd_am@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-5951-9876
Anna KovalenkoDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Kuban State University, Krasnodar 350040, Russia. savanna-05@mail.ru.
Makhamet UrtenovDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Kuban State University, Krasnodar 350040, Russia. urtenovmax@mail.ru.
Victor NikonenkoDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Kuban State University, Krasnodar 350040, Russia. v_nikonenko@mail.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the Nernst⁻Planck and Poisson (NPP) equations allows computation of the space charge density near solution/electrode or solution/ion-exchange membrane interface. This is important in modelling ion transfer, especially when taking into account electroconvective transport. The most solutions in literature use the condition setting a potential difference in the system (potentiostatic or potentiodynamic mode). However, very often in practice and experiment (such as chronopotentiometry and voltammetry), the galvanostatic/galvanodynamic mode is applied. In this study, a depleted stagnant diffusion layer adjacent to an ion-exchange membrane is considered. In this article, a new boundary condition is proposed, which sets a total current density,

Indexed as

electroconvectiongalvanostatic modeion-exchange membranemathematical modellingNernst–Planck and Poisson equationstransition time

Identifiers

PMID30235846
PMCPMC6161193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.