Trial reportMedicine2018
Modifying and evaluating efficacy of interactive computerized program using motion tracking technology to improve unilateral neglect in patients with chronic stroke.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo modify and evaluate the efficacy of a computerized visual perception rehabilitation program using interactive motion tracking technology with unilateral neglect after chronic stroke.
methodsStudy design is single-blinded (analyst-blinded) controlled prospective clinical trial. Subjects are 16 patients with chronic stroke and unilateral neglect for over 6 months and 19 healthy volunteers. We modified our previous program to 9 tasks with built-in scoring system, and the subjects performed 3 sessions per week, 30 minutes per session for 4 weeks.
resultsScores for the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Motor-free Visual Perception Test (MVPT), Line bisection test, Star cancellation test, Forward Digit Test, and Backward Digit Test showed significant improvement at the end of the sessions in the patient group. By comparing the parameters of built-in scoring system of each task among the control group, the first session of training in the patient group, and the last session of training in the patient group, we categorized the parameters for optional measurement to determine the effect of training or to be a candidate for evaluative use.
conclusionsOur modified computerized visual perception rehabilitation program using improved unilateral neglect in patients post-stroke. Built-in scoring system in this program was helpful to assess availability of it more objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.