Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30235356›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comprehensive molecular characterization of microneedling therapy in a human three-dimensional skin model.

Laurenz Schmitt, Yvonne Marquardt, Philipp Amann, Ruth Heise, Laura Huth, Sylvia Wagner-Schiffler, Sebastian Huth, Jens-Malte Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Enabled by Fluorescent Nanodiamond Boronic Hydrogel.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurenz SchmittDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0989-5587
Yvonne MarquardtDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Philipp AmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ruth HeiseDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Laura HuthDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Sylvia Wagner-SchifflerPraxis für Dermatologie, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian HuthDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jens-Malte BaronDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMicroneedling therapy is a widely used technique in dermatology. However, little is known about the underlying molecular effects of this therapy on extracellular matrix remodeling, wound healing, and inflammation. The aim of this study was to examine morphological and molecular changes caused by microneedling treatment in a standardized in vitro full-thickness 3D model of human skin. MATERIALS AND

methodsA microneedling device was used to treat full-thickness 3D skin models. Specimens were harvested at specified time points and qRT-PCR and microarray studies were performed. Frozen sections were examined histologically.

resultsMicroneedling treatment caused morphological changes in the skin model resulting in an almost complete recovery of the epidermis five days after treatment. Microarray analysis identified an upregulation of genes that are associated with tissue remodeling and wound healing (e.g. COL3A1, COL8A1, TIMP3), epithelial proliferation and differentiation (KRT13, IGF1), immune cell recruitment (CCL11), and a member of the heat shock protein family (HSPB6). On the other hand, we detected a downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL1α, IL1β, IL24, IL36γ, IL36RN), and antimicrobial peptides (e.g. S100A7A, DEFB4). These data were confirmed by independent RT-PCR analyses.

conclusionWe present for the first time the direct molecular effects of microneedling therapy on epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts using a standardized 3D skin model. Treatment resulted in histological alterations and changed the expression of various genes related to epidermal differentiation, inflammation, and dermal remodeling. This data suggests that skin microneedling plays a role in dermal remodeling, increases epidermal differentiation, and might also have a direct effect on collagen synthesis. These findings may increase our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of human skin repair induced by microneedling therapy and will allow comparisons with competing applications, such as ablative laser therapies.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksRegenerationCell LineGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, BiologicalNeedlesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaTissue ScaffoldsUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID30235356
PMCPMC6147558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.