Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30235263›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Defense responses of lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes carrying non-allelic ascochyta blight resistance genes to Ascochyta lentis infection.

Ehsan Sari, Vijai Bhadauria, Larissa Ramsay, M Hossein Borhan, Judith Lichtenzveig, Kirstin E Bett, Albert Vandenberg, Sabine Banniza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ehsan SariDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Vijai BhadauriaDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Larissa RamsayDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
M Hossein BorhanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Judith LichtenzveigSchool of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Kirstin E BettDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Albert VandenbergDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sabine BannizaDepartment of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-1572
University of Saskatchewan · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascochyta blight of lentil is an important fungal disease in many lentil-producing regions of the world causing major yield and grain quality losses. Quick shifts in aggressiveness of the population of the causal agent Ascochyta lentis mandates developing germplasm with novel and durable resistance. In the absence of complete resistance, lentil genotypes CDC Robin and 964a-46 have frequently been used as sources of partial resistance to ascochyta blight and carry non-allelic ascochyta blight resistance genes. RNA-seq analysis was conducted to identify differences in the transcriptome of CDC Robin, 964a-46 and the susceptible check Eston after inoculation with A. lentis. Candidate defense genes differentially expressed among the genotypes had hypothetical functions in various layers of plant defense, including pathogen recognition, phytohormone signaling pathways and downstream defense responses. CDC Robin and 964a-46 activated cell surface receptors (e.g. receptor like kinases) tentatively associated with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) recognition and nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) receptors associated with intracellular effector recognition upon A. lentis infection, and differed in their activation of salicylic acid, abscisic acid and jasmonic acid / ethylene signal transduction pathways. These differences were reflected in the differential expression of downstream defense responses such as pathogenesis-related proteins, and genes associated with the induction of cell death and cell-wall reinforcement. A significant correlation between expression levels of a selection of genes based on quantitative real-time PCR and their expression levels estimated through RNA-seq demonstrated the technical and analytical accuracy of RNA-seq for identification of genes differentially expressed among genotypes. The presence of different resistance mechanisms in 964a-46 and CDC Robin indicates their value for pyramiding gene leading to more durable resistance to ascochyta blight.

Indexed as

AllelesGenes, PlantAscomycotaCluster AnalysisDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene OntologyGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeLens PlantPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNAUp-RegulationPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30235263
PMCPMC6147436
OpenAlexW2892293001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.