Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30234675›Full record

Observational studyPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2019

Development and Implementation of a Bedside Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Service in a PICU.

Thomas W Conlon, Adam S Himebauch, Anne Marie Cahill, Blair M Kraus, Chinonyerem R Madu, Mark D Weber, Carol A Czajka, Ruby L Baker, Torron M Brinkley, Melanie D Washington and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas W ConlonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Adam S Himebauch
Anne Marie CahillDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Blair M KrausDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Chinonyerem R MaduDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Mark D WeberDepartment of Nursing-Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Carol A CzajkaDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Ruby L BakerDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Torron M BrinkleyDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Melanie D WashingtonDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Anne Marie FreyDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Eileen M NelsonDepartment of Nursing-Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Cara T JefferiesDepartment of Nursing-Imaging, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Charlotte Z Woods-HillDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Heather A WolfeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniela H DavisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo create a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service to increase placement of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter in PICU patients.

designTwo-phase observational, pre-post design.

settingSingle-center quaternary noncardiac PICU. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the PICU.

interventionsFrom June 1, 2015, to May 31, 2017, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service team was created (phase I) and expanded (phase II) as part of a quality improvement initiative. A multidisciplinary team developed a PICU peripherally inserted central catheter evaluation tool to identify amenable patients and to suggest location and provider for procedure performance. Outcome, process, and balancing metrics were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBedside peripherally inserted central catheter service placed 130 of 493 peripherally inserted central catheter (26%) resulting in 2,447 hospital central catheter days. A shift in bedside peripherally inserted central catheter centerline proportion occurred during both phases. Median time from order to catheter placement was reduced for peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service compared with placement in interventional radiology (6 hr [interquartile range, 2-23 hr] vs 34 hr [interquartile range, 19-61 hr]; p < 0.001). Successful access was achieved by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service providers in 96% of patients with central tip position in 97%. Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were similar to rates for peripherally inserted central catheters placed in interventional radiology (all central line-associated bloodstream infection, 1.23 vs 2.18; p = 0.37 and venous thromboembolism, 1.63 vs 1.57; p = 0.91). Peripherally inserted central catheters in PICU patients had reduced in-hospital venous thromboembolism rate compared with PICU temporary catheter in PICU rate (1.59 vs 5.36; p < 0.001).

conclusionsBedside peripherally inserted central catheter service implementation increased bedside peripherally inserted central catheter placement and employed a patient-centered and timely process. Balancing metrics including central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were not significantly different between peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service and those placed in interventional radiology.

Indexed as

AdolescentCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePoint-of-Care SystemsQuality ImprovementTime FactorsUltrasonography, InterventionalVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID30234675
PMCPMC6322932
OpenAlexW2893843198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.