ReviewLeukemia & lymphoma2019
Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.
Review in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapy induced senescence promotes immunogenicity in acute myeloid Leukemia through reduced EZH2 activity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Phase 1 Study of KITE-222, an Autologous CLL-1-Directed CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Twenty Years of Therapeutic Leukocytapheresis in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Insights From A Single Center.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Article
- Association of DNA damage response gene polymorphisms with treatment response and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Gene regulatory network analysis predicts cooperating transcription factor regulons required for FLT3-ITD+ AML growth.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Posttranslational splicing modifications as a key mechanism in cytarabine resistance in acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2023Article
- European LeukemiaNet-defined primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: the value of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and overall response.Blood cancer journal · 2022Article
- A clinically applicable gene expression-based score predicts resistance to induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or primary induction failure, represents a continued challenge in clinical management. This review presents an overview of primary refractory disease and a discussion of risk factors for induction failure, including current evidence regarding the impact of karyotype and molecular mutation status on responsiveness to chemotherapy. We review the evidence for various treatment options for refractory AML including salvage chemotherapy regimens, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted agents, and non-intensive therapies such as hypomethylating agents. A therapeutic approach to this patient population is presented, and several new and emerging therapies are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.