Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30234397›Full record

ArticleGames for health journal2019

Efficacy and Usability of a Virtual Simulation Training System for Health and Safety Hazards Encountered by Healthcare Workers.

Barbara J Polivka, Sarah Anderson, Steve A Lavender, Carolyn M Sommerich, Donald L Stredney, Celia E Wills, Amy R Darragh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Games for health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06974708 (Interactive Virtual Occupational Safety Training Designed With and for Ohio Home Healthcare Workers and Agencies), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974708 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Interactive Virtual Occupational Safety Training Designed With and for Ohio Home Healthcare Workers and Agencies

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsLearningArmsHome Healthcare Virtual Simulation Training System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara J Polivka1 School of Nursing, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Sarah Anderson2 School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Steve A Lavender3 Department of Integrated Systems Engineering and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Carolyn M Sommerich3 Department of Integrated Systems Engineering and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Donald L Stredney5 Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Celia E Wills6 College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Amy R Darragh2 School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

Home healthcare hazard training through virtual simulationR01OH010425 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI POLIVKA, BARBARA J · 2013 to 2015
$871k
NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the efficacy, usability, usefulness, and desirability (UUD) of a Home Healthcare Interactive Virtual Simulation Training System (HH-VSTS) designed to train home healthcare workers (HHWs) and healthcare students to identify and respond to health and safety hazards in client homes. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to either the HH-VSTS training group or to the paper-based training group. The HH-VSTS group completed three HH-VSTS Training Modules on a laptop/desktop computer. The training modules addressed hazard identification, hazard rationale, and hazard response to electric/fire/burn, slip/trip/lift, and environmental hazards. The paper-based training group reviewed identical information in a written hard-copy format. Both groups completed an HH-VSTS Assessment module. Participants completed demographic/background and UUD questionnaires, and in-system metrics measured their performance on hazard identification, rationale, and response.

resultsParticipants (n = 74) were HHWs and students in health profession programs. There were no significant differences in participants' ability to correctly identify hazards, rationale, or how to address them. Participants identified over 90% of hazards, although fewer participants were able to correctly identify what makes an item a hazard or how to manage it. For those in the HH-VSTS group, over 83% found the HH-VSTS easy to use, over 94% agreed the HH-VSTS was useful, and over 80% liked it.

conclusionThe HH-VSTS provided and engaging, efficacious training that was as effective as a typical paper-based training. In addition, the HH-VSTS is usable by a variety of end users, regardless of computer or gaming experience.

Indexed as

Students, Health OccupationsUser-Computer InterfaceAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansMaleOccupational HealthSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHazard trainingHome healthcare workersInjury and illness preventionVirtual simulation training

Identifiers

PMID30234397
PMCPMC6424645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.