Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30234113›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2018

Experimental Considerations for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Approaches.

Quy H Nguyen, Nicholas Pervolarakis, Kevin Nee, Kai Kessenbrock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptomics reveal the cell populations of intercalary meristems in bamboo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quy H NguyenDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Nicholas PervolarakisCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Kevin NeeDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Kai KessenbrockDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

Mathematical, Computational and Systems BiologyT32EB009418 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D, NIE, QING · 2009 to 2019
$2.4M
Proteolytic regulation of Wnt signaling in breast cancer stem cellsR00CA181490 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KESSENBROCK, KAI · 2016 to 2018
$730k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA181490NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomic technologies have emerged as powerful tools to explore cellular heterogeneity at the resolution of individual cells. Previous scientific knowledge in cell biology is largely limited to data generated by bulk profiling methods, which only provide averaged read-outs that generally mask cellular heterogeneity. This averaged approach is particularly problematic when the biological effect of interest is limited to only a subpopulation of cells such as stem/progenitor cells within a given tissue, or immune cell subsets infiltrating a tumor. Great advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) enabled scientists to overcome this limitation and allow for in depth interrogation of previously unexplored rare cell types. Due to the high sensitivity of scRNAseq, adequate attention must be put into experimental setup and execution. Careful handling and processing of cells for scRNAseq is critical to preserve the native expression profile that will ensure meaningful analysis and conclusions. Here, we delineate the individual steps of a typical single-cell analysis workflow from tissue procurement, cell preparation, to platform selection and data analysis, and we discuss critical challenges in each of these steps, which will serve as a helpful guide to navigate the complex field of single-cell sequencing.

Indexed as

cell isolationcellular heterogeneitycomputational biologysingle-cell analysissingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID30234113
PMCPMC6131190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.