Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233988›Full record

ArticleJBJS essential surgical techniques2018

Mini-Invasive Intramedullary Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with an Elastic Titanium Nail.

Hendrik F S Fuglesang, Mads A Oksum, Annette K B Wikerøy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBJS essential surgical techniques, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hendrik F S FuglesangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway.
Mads A OksumDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway.
Annette K B WikerøyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is still controversial, but surgical treatment provides a shorter recovery period and higher union rates than nonoperative treatment with a sling DESCRIPTION: The patient is placed in beach-chair position with the fluoroscope placed on the injured side or cranially in relation to the fracture. The surgeon pushes the skin gently with his/her index finger at the jugular fossa before incising it. This places the skin incision inferior to the implant. A 1 to 2-cm incision down to the bone is then placed about 1 to 2 cm lateral to the sternoclavicular joint. A unicortical entry hole is made at the medial end with a 2.5-mm drill bit and then widened and directed laterally with an awl. Two reduction forceps are placed percutaneously and used by the assistant to align the main fragments. The nail is passed with oscillating movements until it is secured into the lateral fragment. If it is not possible to obtain a closed reduction, an open reduction is performed. The nail is cut short down to the bone, and the myocutaneous layer and skin are closed with sutures. Five to 10 mL of bupivacaine is injected into the fracture area for postoperative pain management. The arm is placed in a simple sling for comfort. A non-weight-bearing active range of motion of <90° is encouraged. ALTERNATIVES: Closed completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures can be treated operatively or nonoperatively with a sling. Superior plate fixation is well documented, but use of anterior or several mini-fragment plates is also an option. There are several intramedullary implant techniques, but most require an open reduction. RATIONALE: Most intramedullary implant methods are open procedures, whereas closed reduction and internal fixation is possible with ESIN. This ensures preservation of the fracture hematoma and no periosteal stripping, in contrast with the open intramedullary techniques. The nail enters the fracture medially, which decreases the chance of perioperative pulmonary or neurovascular injury. The procedure is less time-consuming than plate fixation, the result is cosmetically superior, and the functional outcomes after 1 year are equal. When ESIN is used for fractures without intermediary fragments, the functional recovery time is equal to that after plate fixation, although it is longer when used for fractures with intermediary fragments

Identifiers

PMID30233988
PMCPMC6143309
OpenAlexW2804510587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.