ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Discrepancies between ALK protein disruption and occurrence of
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural Bacterial and Fungal Peptides as a Promising Treatment to Defeat Lung Cancer Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Botulinum toxin in cancer therapy-current perspectives and limitations.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Crizotinib efficacy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Use of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Diagnosis and Tailored Therapies in Solid Tumors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (
methodsMutations in
resultsThe frequency of
conclusionsWe indicated that diagnosis of ALK disruption in NSCLC patients should be notably careful using IHC and FISH methods. Recommendations for ALK diagnosis should include the way of interpretation of cases with low percentage of cells with abnormal ALK protein expression in IHC test, character of IHC reaction, and cases with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.