ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Application value of the NoSAS score for screening sleep-disordered breathing.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic utility of obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires: a comprehensive meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of NoSAS in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2022Pooled it
- Soluble P-selectin levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Use and Performance of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Across Geographic Regions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Performance of six screening scores for obstructive sleep apnoea in an African population: findings from the BeSAS cross-sectional study.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- NoSAS score and the 5-year risk of incident cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of NoSAS score with STOP-Bang and Berlin scores in predicting difficult airway.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Association between NoSAS score and cardiovascular disease in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Improving OSA screening efficiency with subjective questionnaires: integrating STOP-Bang, ESS, and Berlin.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- NoSAS score predicts cardiovascular disease in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- A New Screening Tool (BAMSA) for Sleep Apnea in Male Professional Truck Drivers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023Review
- 24-hour urinary potassium excretion is negatively associated with self-reported sleep quality in the general population, independently of sleep-disordered breathing.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
- Use of the pictorial Sleepiness and Sleep Apnoea Scale in Chinese patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Are the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains considered in the obstructive sleep apnea instruments? An integrative review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Review
- Validation of the NoSAS score for screening sleep-disordered breathing: A sleep clinic- based study in TurkeyTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Pulmonary Function Influences the Performance of Berlin Questionnaire, Modified Berlin Questionnaire, and STOP-Bang Score for Screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening with a 4-Item Instrument, Named GOAL Questionnaire: Development, Validation and Comparative Study with No-Apnea, STOP-Bang, and NoSAS.Nature and science of sleep · 2020Article
- Validation of the NoSAS Score for the Screening of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in a Sleep Clinic.Canadian respiratory journal · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) requires overnight polysomnography (PSG). Because of the cost and low availability of these procedures, the NoSAS score was developed to identify subjects at high risk of SDB. To evaluate the clinical utility of the NoSAS score for screening patients with SDB in China and to compare the predictive value of the NoSAS score with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), we used the STOP-Bang questionnaire and the Berlin questionnaire.
methodsIn our study, we retrospectively reviewed the existing clinical data of patients who underwent an overnight PSG for suspected SDB from June 2014 to September 2017 at the sleep medical center of Guangdong Medical University Affiliated Second Hospital. The information we collected included all parts of the NoSAS score, the ESS, the STOP-Bang questionnaire and the Berlin questionnaire. Based on the severity of SDB determined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the patients were classified into four groups of primary snoring (<5 events/h), mild SBD (AHI ≥5 and <15 events/h), moderate SBD (AHI ≥15 and ≤30 events/h) and severe SBD (>30 events/h). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the five questionnaires to compare their relative efficacy for screening SDB.
resultsA total of 479 consecutive patients (374 males and 105 females) ranging in age from 18 to 80 years old (mean ± SD, 48.9±14.4 years old) were recruited into this study. When using the standard of AHI ≥5 for diagnosing SDB, the NoSAS score had the largest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC =0.734), and the Berlin questionnaire (AUC =0.732) came second. Both exhibited a better predictive value than the ESS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire. Using NoSAS ≥8 to predict AHI ≥5 events/h, AHI ≥15 events/h and AHI >30 events/h, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.590 and 0.707, 0.649 and 0.626, and 0.644 and 0.562, respectively; for the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the values were 0.721 and 0.512, 0.752 and 0.440, and 0.763 and 0.399, respectively; and for the Berlin questionnaire, the values were 0.721 and 0.512, 0.752 and 0.440, and 0.763 and 0.399, respectively.
conclusionsThe NoSAS score and the Berlin questionnaire both exhibited good predictive value for SDB patients. NoSAS is a more suitable questionnaire to use in clinic for the conveniences but the similar performance with another questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.