ArticleBiomedical reports2018
Article in Biomedical reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between vitamin D receptor BsmI, FokI, and Cdx2 polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: an updated meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Vitamin D Genetics Beyond Serum 25(OH)D:Nutrients · 2025Article
- Article
- Elucidating common biomarkers and pathways of osteoporosis and aortic valve calcification: insights into new therapeutic targets.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Modulation of the vitamin D/vitamin D receptor system in osteoporosis pathogenesis: insights and therapeutic approaches.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Review
- Current issues in evaluation and management of osteoporosis in Thailand.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2023Review
- Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variants Susceptible to Osteoporosis in Arab Post-Menopausal Women.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- Vitamin D receptor Bsm I polymorphism and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis from 42 studies.Genes & nutrition · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining molecular markers for osteoporosis may be valuable for improving the quality of life of affected elderly patients by aiding in early detection and disease management. In the present study, the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the vitamin D receptor (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.