ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Therapeutic effects of new-type hydraulic delivery vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty and conventional pusher-type vertebroplasty on single segmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Balloon Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty: A Systematic Review of Height Restoration in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.Journal of pain research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate safety and practicality in clinical application for better guidance of single segmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treatment. From May 2012 to September 2013, a total of 188 cases of patients with fractures, who received different treatment, were incorporated in the study and then divided into: group A (n=59), conventional pusher-type vertebroplasty; group B (n=54), balloon kyphoplasty; group C (n=60), new-type hydraulic delivery vertebroplasty treatment. The overall follow-up rate was 92.02%. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved more than those of the preoperative scores in the three groups. Bone cement injection volumes in group A were significantly lower than those in group B and group C. Vertebral height recovery rates among groups were obviously different, showing statistical significance. After a year of follow-up, the vertebral height recovery outcome in group A was obviously poorer than that in group B and group C. A poorer outcome in group B was also found when compared with group C. In addition, the vertebral height restoration had a certain degree of loss, with the loss rate of 20.5, 14.0 and 7.5% in the three groups, respectively. Three operation methods have equivalent effects in the improvement of symptoms and functional recovery. Therefore, the new-type hydraulic delivery vertebroplasty provides a relatively more concise operation and shorter operation time, displaying more outstanding performance of clinical efficacy in spinal reconstruction and reduction of complications risks by evaluating the diffusion of the bone cement, vertebral height restoration rate and postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.