ArticleFrontiers in genetics2018
Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes Using Genic Similarity Based Relatedness Matrix.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome Selection for Fleece Traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats Based on GWAS Prior Marker Information.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats by Integrating GWAS Prior Information.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction and Heritability Estimation for Daughter Pregnancy Rate in U.S. Holstein Cows Using SNP, Epistasis and Haplotype Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Weaning Weight in Alpine Merino Sheep Based on GWAS Prior Marker Information.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- From genotype to phenotype in Arabidopsis thaliana: in-silico genome interpretation predicts 288 phenotypes from sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Assessment of Greenhouse Tomato Anthesis Rate Through Metabolomics Using LASSO Regularized Linear Regression Model.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- The Genetic Basis of Tomato Aroma.Genes · 2021Review
- Prior Biological Knowledge Improves Genomic Prediction of Growth-Related Traits inFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genetic Analysis of QTL for Resistance to Maize Lethal Necrosis in Multiple Mapping Populations.Genes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last years, a series of methods for genomic prediction (GP) have been established, and the advantages of GP over pedigree best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) have been reported. However, the majority of previously proposed GP models are purely based on mathematical considerations while seldom take the abundant biological knowledge into account. Prediction ability of those models largely depends on the consistency between the statistical assumptions and the underlying genetic architectures of traits of interest. In this study, gene annotation information was incorporated into GP models by constructing haplotypes with SNPs mapped to genic regions. Haplotype allele similarity between pairs of individuals was measured through different approaches at single gene level and then converted into whole genome level, which was then treated as a special kernel and used in kernel based GP models. Results shown that the gene annotation guided methods gave higher or at least comparable predictive ability in some traits, especially in the Arabidopsis dataset and the rice breeding population. Compared to SNP models and haplotype models without gene annotation, the gene annotation based models improved the predictive ability by 0.56~26.67% in the Arabidopsis and 1.62~16.53% in the rice breeding population, respectively. However, incorporating gene annotation slightly improved the predictive ability for several traits but did not show any extra gain for the rest traits in a chicken population. In conclusion, integrating gene annotation into GP models could be beneficial for some traits, species, and populations compared to SNP models and haplotype models without gene annotation. However, more studies are yet to be conducted to implicitly investigate the characteristics of these gene annotation guided models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.