ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directed Evolution of Plant-Associated Bacteria Enhances Plant Holobiont Stress Tolerance.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances and prospects of genomic-assisted breeding in roots, tubers, and banana crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Regulatory challenges and global trade implications of genome editing in agriculture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.GM crops & food · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.PloS one · 2024Article
- Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- State-of-the-Art in CRISPR Technology and Engineering Drought, Salinity, and Thermo-tolerant crop plants.Plant cell reports · 2022Review
- Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion.Transgenic research · 2021Article
- Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Biofortification of Cereals and Pulses Using New Breeding Techniques: Current and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Targeted plant hologenome editing for plant trait enhancement.The New phytologist · 2021Article
- Importance of the Rhizosphere Microbiota in Iron Biofortification of Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.Transgenic research · 2019Article
- Estimating the cost of regulating genome edited crops: expert judgment and overconfidence.GM crops & food · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging precision breeding techniques have great potential to develop new crop varieties with specific traits that can contribute to ensuring future food security in a time of increasing climate change pressures, such as disease, insects and drought. These techniques offer options for crop trait development in both private and public sector breeding programs. Yet, the success of new breeding techniques is not guaranteed at the scientific level alone: political influences and social acceptance significantly contribute to how crops will perform in the market. Using survey data, we report results from an international panel of experts regarding the institutional and social barriers that might impede the development of new plant technologies. Survey results clearly indicate that regulatory issues, social, and environmental concerns are critical to the success of precision breeding. The cross-regional analysis shows heterogeneity between Europeans and North Americans, particularly regarding political attitudes and social perceptions of targeted breeding techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.