Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233621›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Whole Mount

Anna M Wójcik, Magdalena Mosiolek, Jagna Karcz, Michael D Nodine, Małgorzata D Gaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. miR172 RegulatesCells · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Epigenetic Regulation of Auxin-Induced Somatic Embryogenesis in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Guidelines for the Optimization and Validation of In Situ Hybridization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna M WójcikDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Magdalena MosiolekGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Jagna KarczScanning Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Michael D NodineGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Małgorzata D GajDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) results from the transition of differentiated plant somatic cells into embryogenic cells that requires the extensive reprogramming of the somatic cell transcriptome. Commonly, the SE-involved genes are identified by analyzing the heterogeneous population of explant cells and thus, it is necessary to validate the expression of the candidate genes in the cells that are competent for embryogenic transition. Here, we optimized and implemented the whole mount

Indexed as

Arabidopsisin situ hybridisationin vitromiRNAmRNAsomatic embryogenesisWISH

Identifiers

PMID30233621
PMCPMC6131960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.