Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Whole Genome Characterization of a Few EMS-Induced Mutants of Upland Rice Variety Nagina 22 Reveals a Staggeringly High Frequency of SNPs Which Show High Phenotypic Plasticity Towards the Wild-Type.

Amitha M V Sevanthi, Prashant Kandwal, Prashant B Kale, Chandra Prakash, M K Ramkumar, Neera Yadav, Ajay K Mahato, V Sureshkumar, Motilal Behera, Rupesh K Deshmukh and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Overexpression of a DUF740 family gene (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Amitha M V SevanthiICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Prashant KandwalICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Prashant B KaleICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Chandra PrakashICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
M K RamkumarICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Neera YadavICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Ajay K MahatoICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
V SureshkumarICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Motilal BeheraICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India.
Rupesh K DeshmukhLaval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
P JeyaparakashTamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Meera K KarICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India.
S ManonmaniTamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Raveendran MuthurajanTamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
K S GopalaICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sarla NeelamrajuICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad, India.
M S SheshshayeeUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.
P SwainICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India.
Ashok K SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
N K SinghICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Trilochan MohapatraIndian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi, India.
R P SharmaICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INCentral Rice Research Institute · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Institute of Rice Research · INUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Indian initiative, in creating mutant resources for the functional genomics in rice, has been instrumental in the development of 87,000 ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS)-induced mutants, of which 7,000 are in advanced generations. The mutants have been created in the background of Nagina 22, a popular drought- and heat-tolerant upland cultivar. As it is a pregreen revolution cultivar, as many as 573 dwarf mutants identified from this resource could be useful as an alternate source of dwarfing. A total of 541 mutants, including the macromutants and the trait-specific ones, obtained after appropriate screening, are being maintained in the mutant garden. Here, we report on the detailed characterizations of the 541 mutants based on the distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) descriptors at two different locations. About 90% of the mutants were found to be similar to the wild type (WT) with high similarity index (>0.6) at both the locations. All 541 mutants were characterized for chlorophyll and epicuticular wax contents, while a subset of 84 mutants were characterized for their ionomes, namely, phosphorous, silicon, and chloride contents. Genotyping of these mutants with 54 genomewide simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers revealed 93% of the mutants to be either completely identical to WT or nearly identical with just one polymorphic locus. Whole genome resequencing (WGS) of four mutants, which have minimal differences in the SSR fingerprint pattern and DUS characters from the WT, revealed a staggeringly high number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on an average (16,453 per mutant) in the genic sequences. Of these, nearly 50% of the SNPs led to non-synonymous codons, while 30% resulted in synonymous codons. The number of insertions and deletions (InDels) varied from 898 to 2,595, with more than 80% of them being 1-2 bp long. Such a high number of SNPs could pose a serious challenge in identifying gene(s) governing the mutant phenotype by next generation sequencing-based mapping approaches such as Mutmap. From the WGS data of the WT and the mutants, we developed a genic resource of the WT with a novel analysis pipeline. The entire information about this resource along with the panicle architecture of the 493 mutants is made available in a mutant database EMS

Indexed as

EMS mutantsionomicsmutant resourcemutation frequencyNagina 22rice

Identifiers

PMID30233603
PMCPMC6132179
OpenAlexW2891281970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.